qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ppc/pnv: use a do-while() loop in pnv_phb3_translate_


From: Daniel Henrique Barboza
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ppc/pnv: use a do-while() loop in pnv_phb3_translate_tve()
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:09:10 -0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0



On 1/27/22 08:41, Matheus K. Ferst wrote:
On 26/01/2022 17:14, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
The 'taddr' variable is left unintialized, being set only inside the
"while ((lev--) >= 0)" loop where we get the TCE address. The 'lev' var
is an int32_t that is being initiliazed by the GETFIELD() macro, which
returns an uint64_t.

For a human reader this means that 'lev' will always be positive or zero.
But some compilers may beg to differ. 'lev' being an int32_t can in theory
be set as negative, and the "while ((lev--) >= 0)" loop might never be
reached, and 'taddr' will be left unitialized. This can cause phb3_error()
to use 'taddr' uninitialized down below:

if ((is_write & !(tce & 2)) || ((!is_write) && !(tce & 1))) {
     phb3_error(phb, "TCE access fault at 0x%"PRIx64, taddr);

A quick way of fixing it is to use a do/while() loop. This will keep the
same semanting as the existing while() loop does and the compiler will
understand that 'taddr' will be initialized at least once.

Suggested-by: Matheus K. Ferst <matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br>
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/573
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
---
  hw/pci-host/pnv_phb3.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb3.c b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb3.c
index 7fb35dc031..39a6184419 100644
--- a/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb3.c
+++ b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb3.c
@@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ static void pnv_phb3_translate_tve(PnvPhb3DMASpace *ds, 
hwaddr addr,
          sh = tbl_shift * lev + tce_shift;

          /* TODO: Multi-level untested */
-        while ((lev--) >= 0) {
+        do {
              /* Grab the TCE address */
              taddr = base | (((addr >> sh) & ((1ul << tbl_shift) - 1)) << 3);
              if (dma_memory_read(&address_space_memory, taddr, &tce,
@@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ static void pnv_phb3_translate_tve(PnvPhb3DMASpace *ds, 
hwaddr addr,
              }
              sh -= tbl_shift;
              base = tce & ~0xfffull;
-        }
+        } while ((lev--) >= 0);

This changes the number of iterations in this loop.

ooofff

We'd need "while ((--lev) >= 0)" to keep it the same, but then we would be checking 
"!(tce & 3)" for the last iteration. Is that a problem?


I don't think that's a problem because then (lev >= 0) will not be true and 
we'll
not going to check !(tce &3), so even if 'tce' has a bogus value it's fine.


Daniel







Thanks,
Matheus K. Ferst
Instituto de Pesquisas ELDORADO <http://www.eldorado.org.br/>
Analista de Software
Aviso Legal - Disclaimer <https://www.eldorado.org.br/disclaimer.html>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]