qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/1] target/ppc: fix 'skip KVM' cond in cpu_interrupt_exittb(


From: Greg Kurz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] target/ppc: fix 'skip KVM' cond in cpu_interrupt_exittb()
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:12:20 +0100

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:08:41 -0300
Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> wrote:

> cpu_interrupt_exittb() was introduced by commit 044897ef4a22
> ("target/ppc: Fix system lockups caused by interrupt_request state
> corruption") as a way to wrap cpu_interrupt() helper in BQL.
> 
> After that, commit 6d38666a8931 ("ppc: Ignore the CPU_INTERRUPT_EXITTB
> interrupt with KVM") added a condition to skip this interrupt if we're
> running with KVM.
> 
> Problem is that the change made by the above commit, testing for
> !kvm_enabled() at the start of cpu_interrupt_exittb():
> 
> static inline void cpu_interrupt_exittb(CPUState *cs)
> {
>     if (!kvm_enabled()) {
>         return;
>     }
>     (... do cpu_interrupt(cs, CPU_INTERRUPT_EXITTB) ...)
> 
> is doing the opposite of what it intended to do. This will return
> immediately if not kvm_enabled(), i.e. it's a emulated CPU, and if
> kvm_enabled() it will proceed to fire CPU_INTERRUPT_EXITTB.
> 

Ohh boy... this is embarrassing :-\

> Fix the 'skip KVM' condition so the function is a no-op when
> kvm_enabled().
> 
> CC: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
> Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/809
> Fixes: 6d38666a8931 ("ppc: Ignore the CPU_INTERRUPT_EXITTB interrupt with 
> KVM")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>

>  target/ppc/helper_regs.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/ppc/helper_regs.c b/target/ppc/helper_regs.c
> index 8671b7bb69..7dca585ddd 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/helper_regs.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/helper_regs.c
> @@ -201,7 +201,11 @@ void cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong 
> *pc,
>  
>  void cpu_interrupt_exittb(CPUState *cs)
>  {
> -    if (!kvm_enabled()) {
> +    /*
> +     * We don't need to worry about translation blocks
> +     * when running with KVM.
> +     */
> +    if (kvm_enabled()) {
>          return;
>      }
>  




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]