qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] ppc/pnv: Introduce user creatable pnv-phb4 devices


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] ppc/pnv: Introduce user creatable pnv-phb4 devices
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:12:32 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0

On 1/10/22 15:33, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
This patch introduces pnv-phb4 user creatable devices that are created
in a similar manner as pnv-phb3 devices, allowing the user to interact
with the PHBs directly instead of creating PCI Express Controllers that
will create a certain amount of PHBs per controller index.

We accomplish this by doing the following:

- add a pnv_phb4_get_stack() helper to retrieve which stack an user
created phb4 would occupy;

- if a suitable pec->stack is found, setup the phb attributes in a
similar fashion as done in pnv_phb4_pec_realize() when defaults are
enabled;

- use 'defaults_enabled()' in pnv_pec_stk_instance_init() to avoid
creating a 'stack->phb' qdev that might be overwritten by an user
created pnv-phb4 device.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
---
  hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4.c     | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c | 25 ++++++-----
  hw/ppc/pnv.c               |  2 +
  3 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4.c b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4.c
index fc23a96b7f..8c8f5dd0e1 100644
--- a/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4.c
+++ b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4.c
@@ -1229,15 +1229,97 @@ static void pnv_phb4_instance_init(Object *obj)
      object_initialize_child(obj, "source", &phb->xsrc, TYPE_XIVE_SOURCE);
  }
+static PnvPhb4PecStack *pnv_phb4_get_stack(PnvChip *chip, PnvPHB4 *phb,
+                                           Error **errp)
+{
+    Pnv9Chip *chip9 = NULL;
+    int chip_id = phb->chip_id;
+    int index = phb->phb_id;


Change the pnv_phb4_get_stack() prototype to :

  static PnvPhb4PecStack *pnv_phb4_get_stack(int chip_id, int index,
                                             Error **errp);

it will simplify the pnv_phb4_realize() routine.


+    int i, j;
+
+    if (chip->num_pecs == 0) {
+        /*
+         * This is expected to happen since chip-id and index are
+         * being set by the user in the command line. Return an
+         * informative error instead of asserting.
+         */

I don't understand how this can happen since num_pecs is initialized :
chip->num_pecs = pcc->num_pecs

and

  k->num_pecs = PNV9_CHIP_MAX_PEC;

+        error_setg(errp, "chip id %d has no PCIE controllers", chip_id);
+        return NULL;
+    }
+
+    chip9 = PNV9_CHIP(chip);
+
+    for (i = 0; i < chip->num_pecs; i++) {
+        /*
+         * For each PEC, check the amount of stacks it supports
+         * and see if the given phb4 index matches a stack.
+         */
+        PnvPhb4PecState *pec = &chip9->pecs[i];
+
+        for (j = 0; j < pec->num_stacks; j++) {
+            if (index == pnv_phb4_pec_get_phb_id(pec, j)) {
+                return &pec->stacks[j];
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    error_setg(errp,
+               "pnv-phb4 chip-id %d index %d didn't match any existing PEC",
+               chip_id, index);
+
+    return NULL;
+}
+
  static void pnv_phb4_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
  {
      PnvPHB4 *phb = PNV_PHB4(dev);
      PCIHostState *pci = PCI_HOST_BRIDGE(dev);
      XiveSource *xsrc = &phb->xsrc;
+    PnvPhb4PecStack *stack = NULL;
+    Error *local_err = NULL;
      int nr_irqs;
      char name[32];
- assert(phb->stack);
+    /* User created PHB */
+    if (!phb->stack) {
+        PnvMachineState *pnv = PNV_MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
+        PnvChip *chip = pnv_get_chip(pnv, phb->chip_id);
+        BusState *s;
+
+        if (!chip) {
+            error_setg(errp, "invalid chip id: %d", phb->chip_id);
+            return;
+        }
+
+        stack = pnv_phb4_get_stack(chip, phb, &local_err);
+        if (local_err) {
+            error_propagate(errp, local_err);
+            return;
+        }
+
+        /*
+         * Assign the phb to the stack. If pnv_phb4_get_stack() returned
+         * stack = NULL without an error we're better of aborting.
+         */
+        g_assert(stack);

This can not happend if pnv_phb4_get_stack() returns local_err;

+        stack->phb = phb;
+
+        object_property_set_int(OBJECT(phb), "index",
+                                phb->phb_id, &error_abort);

This is redundant. "index" has already been set by the user if the PHB
is user created or by the PnvPhb4PecStack realize routine.

+        pnv_phb4_set_stack_phb_props(stack, phb);

I have the feeling this should be called after the 'if (!phb->stack)'
code section and not in pnv_pec_realize() like PATCH 5 does.

+
+        /*
+         * Reparent user created devices to the chip to build
+         * correctly the device tree.
+         */
+        pnv_chip_parent_fixup(chip, OBJECT(phb), phb->phb_id);
+
+        s = qdev_get_parent_bus(DEVICE(chip));
+        if (!qdev_set_parent_bus(DEVICE(phb), s, &local_err)) {
+            error_propagate(errp, local_err);
+            return;
+        }
+    }
/* Set the "big_phb" flag */
      phb->big_phb = phb->phb_id == 0 || phb->phb_id == 3;
@@ -1342,7 +1424,7 @@ static void pnv_phb4_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void 
*data)
      dc->realize         = pnv_phb4_realize;
      device_class_set_props(dc, pnv_phb4_properties);
      set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_BRIDGE, dc->categories);
-    dc->user_creatable  = false;
+    dc->user_creatable  = true;
xfc->notify = pnv_phb4_xive_notify;
  }
diff --git a/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c
index 5e02a51f04..1e3233e7ec 100644
--- a/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c
+++ b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4_pec.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
  #include "hw/pci/pci_bus.h"
  #include "hw/ppc/pnv.h"
  #include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
+#include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
#include <libfdt.h> @@ -397,15 +398,17 @@ static void pnv_pec_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
          object_property_set_int(stk_obj, "stack-no", i, &error_abort);
          object_property_set_link(stk_obj, "pec", OBJECT(pec), &error_abort);
- /*
-         * stack->phb->index is dependent on the position the
-         * stack occupies in pec->stacks[]. We have this information
-         * available here via the 'i' iterator so it's convenient to
-         * do it now.
-         */
-        object_property_set_int(OBJECT(stack->phb), "index", phb_id,
-                                &error_abort);
-        pnv_phb4_set_stack_phb_props(stack, stack->phb);
+        if (defaults_enabled()) {
+            /*
+             * stack->phb->index is dependent on the position the
+             * stack occupies in pec->stacks[]. We have this information
+             * available here via the 'i' iterator so it's convenient to
+             * do it now.
+             */
+            object_property_set_int(OBJECT(stack->phb), "index", phb_id,
+                                    &error_abort);
+            pnv_phb4_set_stack_phb_props(stack, stack->phb);
+        }

This clearly belongs to PHB4 realize handler.

Thanks,

C.

          if (!qdev_realize(DEVICE(stk_obj), NULL, errp)) {
              return;
@@ -543,7 +546,9 @@ static void pnv_pec_stk_instance_init(Object *obj)
  {
      PnvPhb4PecStack *stack = PNV_PHB4_PEC_STACK(obj);
- stack->phb = PNV_PHB4(qdev_new(TYPE_PNV_PHB4));
+    if (defaults_enabled()) {
+        stack->phb = PNV_PHB4(qdev_new(TYPE_PNV_PHB4));
+    }
  }
static void pnv_pec_stk_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
index fe7e67e73a..837146a2fb 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
@@ -1960,6 +1960,8 @@ static void pnv_machine_power9_class_init(ObjectClass 
*oc, void *data)
      pmc->compat = compat;
      pmc->compat_size = sizeof(compat);
      pmc->dt_power_mgt = pnv_dt_power_mgt;
+
+    machine_class_allow_dynamic_sysbus_dev(mc, TYPE_PNV_PHB4);
  }
static void pnv_machine_power10_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]