[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_ui() helper
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_ui() helper |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Mar 2020 11:42:07 +1100 |
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 11:41:37AM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:33:10PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Introduce the req_ui() helper which returns a pointer to
> > the viosrp_iu union held in the vscsi_req structure.
> > This simplifies the next patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> > index 3cb5a38181..f1a0bbdc31 100644
> > --- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> > +++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
> > @@ -97,6 +97,12 @@ typedef struct {
> > vscsi_req reqs[VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT];
> > } VSCSIState;
> >
> > +static union viosrp_iu *req_iu(vscsi_req *req)
> > +{
> > + return (union viosrp_iu *)req->iu.srp.reserved;
>
> I guess it doesn't really matter since you remove it in the next
> patch, but this seems a really weird way of expressing
> return &req->iu;
Oh, also s/req_ui/req_iu/g in the commit message.
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> > static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_get_req(VSCSIState *s)
> > {
> > vscsi_req *req;
> > @@ -121,7 +127,7 @@ static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_find_req(VSCSIState *s,
> > uint64_t srp_tag)
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT; i++) {
> > req = &s->reqs[i];
> > - if (req->iu.srp.cmd.tag == srp_tag) {
> > + if (req_iu(req)->srp.cmd.tag == srp_tag) {
> > return req;
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -188,7 +194,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_iu(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
> > req->crq.s.reserved = 0x00;
> > req->crq.s.timeout = cpu_to_be16(0x0000);
> > req->crq.s.IU_length = cpu_to_be16(length);
> > - req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr = req->iu.srp.rsp.tag; /* right byte order */
> > + req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr = req_iu(req)->srp.rsp.tag; /* right byte order
> > */
> >
> > if (rc == 0) {
> > req->crq.s.status = VIOSRP_OK;
> > @@ -224,7 +230,7 @@ static void vscsi_makeup_sense(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req
> > *req,
> > static int vscsi_send_rsp(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
> > uint8_t status, int32_t res_in, int32_t res_out)
> > {
> > - union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
> > + union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
> > uint64_t tag = iu->srp.rsp.tag;
> > int total_len = sizeof(iu->srp.rsp);
> > uint8_t sol_not = iu->srp.cmd.sol_not;
> > @@ -285,7 +291,7 @@ static int vscsi_fetch_desc(VSCSIState *s, struct
> > vscsi_req *req,
> > unsigned n, unsigned buf_offset,
> > struct srp_direct_buf *ret)
> > {
> > - struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req->iu.srp.cmd;
> > + struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req_iu(req)->srp.cmd;
> >
> > switch (req->dma_fmt) {
> > case SRP_NO_DATA_DESC: {
> > @@ -473,7 +479,7 @@ static int data_out_desc_size(struct srp_cmd *cmd)
> >
> > static int vscsi_preprocess_desc(vscsi_req *req)
> > {
> > - struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req->iu.srp.cmd;
> > + struct srp_cmd *cmd = &req_iu(req)->srp.cmd;
> >
> > req->cdb_offset = cmd->add_cdb_len & ~3;
> >
> > @@ -655,7 +661,7 @@ static void *vscsi_load_request(QEMUFile *f,
> > SCSIRequest *sreq)
> >
> > static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> > {
> > - union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
> > + union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
> > struct srp_login_rsp *rsp = &iu->srp.login_rsp;
> > uint64_t tag = iu->srp.rsp.tag;
> >
> > @@ -681,7 +687,7 @@ static void vscsi_process_login(VSCSIState *s,
> > vscsi_req *req)
> >
> > static void vscsi_inquiry_no_target(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> > {
> > - uint8_t *cdb = req->iu.srp.cmd.cdb;
> > + uint8_t *cdb = req_iu(req)->srp.cmd.cdb;
> > uint8_t resp_data[36];
> > int rc, len, alen;
> >
> > @@ -770,7 +776,7 @@ static void vscsi_report_luns(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req
> > *req)
> >
> > static int vscsi_queue_cmd(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> > {
> > - union srp_iu *srp = &req->iu.srp;
> > + union srp_iu *srp = &req_iu(req)->srp;
> > SCSIDevice *sdev;
> > int n, lun;
> >
> > @@ -821,7 +827,7 @@ static int vscsi_queue_cmd(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req
> > *req)
> >
> > static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> > {
> > - union viosrp_iu *iu = &req->iu;
> > + union viosrp_iu *iu = req_iu(req);
> > vscsi_req *tmpreq;
> > int i, lun = 0, resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_COMPLETE;
> > SCSIDevice *d;
> > @@ -831,7 +837,8 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s,
> > vscsi_req *req)
> > fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt %02x\n",
> > iu->srp.tsk_mgmt.tsk_mgmt_func);
> >
> > - d = vscsi_device_find(&s->bus, be64_to_cpu(req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.lun),
> > &lun);
> > + d = vscsi_device_find(&s->bus,
> > + be64_to_cpu(req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.lun),
> > &lun);
> > if (!d) {
> > resp = SRP_TSK_MGMT_FIELDS_INVALID;
> > } else {
> > @@ -842,7 +849,7 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s,
> > vscsi_req *req)
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > - tmpreq = vscsi_find_req(s, req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.task_tag);
> > + tmpreq = vscsi_find_req(s, req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.task_tag);
> > if (tmpreq && tmpreq->sreq) {
> > assert(tmpreq->sreq->hba_private);
> > scsi_req_cancel(tmpreq->sreq);
> > @@ -867,7 +874,8 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s,
> > vscsi_req *req)
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < VSCSI_REQ_LIMIT; i++) {
> > tmpreq = &s->reqs[i];
> > - if (tmpreq->iu.srp.cmd.lun != req->iu.srp.tsk_mgmt.lun) {
> > + if (req_iu(tmpreq)->srp.cmd.lun
> > + != req_iu(req)->srp.tsk_mgmt.lun) {
> > continue;
> > }
> > if (!tmpreq->active || !tmpreq->sreq) {
> > @@ -911,7 +919,7 @@ static int vscsi_process_tsk_mgmt(VSCSIState *s,
> > vscsi_req *req)
> >
> > static int vscsi_handle_srp_req(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> > {
> > - union srp_iu *srp = &req->iu.srp;
> > + union srp_iu *srp = &req_iu(req)->srp;
> > int done = 1;
> > uint8_t opcode = srp->rsp.opcode;
> >
> > @@ -948,7 +956,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_adapter_info(VSCSIState *s,
> > vscsi_req *req)
> > struct mad_adapter_info_data info;
> > int rc;
> >
> > - sinfo = &req->iu.mad.adapter_info;
> > + sinfo = &req_iu(req)->mad.adapter_info;
> >
> > #if 0 /* What for ? */
> > rc = spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, be64_to_cpu(sinfo->buffer),
> > @@ -984,7 +992,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_capabilities(VSCSIState *s,
> > vscsi_req *req)
> > uint64_t buffer;
> > int rc;
> >
> > - vcap = &req->iu.mad.capabilities;
> > + vcap = &req_iu(req)->mad.capabilities;
> > req_len = len = be16_to_cpu(vcap->common.length);
> > buffer = be64_to_cpu(vcap->buffer);
> > if (len > sizeof(cap)) {
> > @@ -1029,7 +1037,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_capabilities(VSCSIState *s,
> > vscsi_req *req)
> >
> > static int vscsi_handle_mad_req(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
> > {
> > - union mad_iu *mad = &req->iu.mad;
> > + union mad_iu *mad = &req_iu(req)->mad;
> > bool request_handled = false;
> > uint64_t retlen = 0;
> >
>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [PATCH 0/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Fix time bomb zero-length array use, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/03/04
- [PATCH 2/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Use SRP_MAX_IU_LEN instead of sizeof flexible array, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/03/04
- [PATCH 1/5] hw/scsi/viosrp: Add missing 'hw/scsi/srp.h' include, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/03/04
- [PATCH 3/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Simplify a bit, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/03/04
- [PATCH 4/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Introduce req_ui() helper, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/03/04
- [PATCH 5/5] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/03/04