qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 06/25] ppc/pnv: Implement the XiveFabric interface


From: Greg Kurz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/25] ppc/pnv: Implement the XiveFabric interface
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 11:05:15 +0200

On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 18:06:26 +0200
Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> wrote:

> The CAM line matching on the PowerNV machine now scans all chips of
> the system and all CPUs of a chip to find a dispatched NVT in the
> thread contexts.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/ppc/pnv.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> index 77a86c6a2301..ca24dd62df23 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> @@ -1378,6 +1378,35 @@ static void pnv_pic_print_info(InterruptStatsProvider 
> *obj,
>      }
>  }
>  
> +static int pnv_xive_match_nvt(XiveFabric *xfb, uint8_t format,
> +                               uint8_t nvt_blk, uint32_t nvt_idx,
> +                               bool cam_ignore, uint8_t priority,
> +                               uint32_t logic_serv,
> +                               XiveTCTXMatch *match)

Hmm, patch 2 already introduces a function with the same name:

--- a/hw/intc/pnv_xive.c
+++ b/hw/intc/pnv_xive.c
@@ -392,6 +392,45 @@ static int pnv_xive_get_eas(XiveRouter *xrtr, uint8_t blk, 
uint32_t idx,
     return pnv_xive_vst_read(xive, VST_TSEL_IVT, blk, idx, eas);
 }
 
+static int pnv_xive_match_nvt(XivePresenter *xptr, uint8_t format,
+                              uint8_t nvt_blk, uint32_t nvt_idx,
+                              bool cam_ignore, uint8_t priority,
+                              uint32_t logic_serv, XiveTCTXMatch *match)
+{

This is valid because both are static functions in different compilation
units, but it usually better to avoid naming collisions (for an easier
gdb experience for example).

Anyway, I guess this isn't a problem if we reparent TM contexts to the
XIVE router, since we wouldn't need patches 1 to 3 anymore if I get it
right.

> +{
> +    PnvMachineState *pnv = PNV_MACHINE(xfb);
> +    int total_count = 0;
> +    int i;
> +
> +    for (i = 0; i < pnv->num_chips; i++) {
> +        Pnv9Chip *chip9 = PNV9_CHIP(pnv->chips[i]);
> +        XivePresenter *xptr = XIVE_PRESENTER(&chip9->xive);
> +        XivePresenterClass *xpc = XIVE_PRESENTER_GET_CLASS(xptr);
> +        int count;
> +
> +        count = xpc->match_nvt(xptr, format, nvt_blk, nvt_idx, cam_ignore,
> +                               priority, logic_serv, match);
> +
> +        if (count < 0) {
> +            return count;
> +        }
> +
> +        total_count += count;
> +    }
> +
> +    return total_count;
> +}
> +
>  static void pnv_get_num_chips(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
>                                void *opaque, Error **errp)
>  {
> @@ -1441,9 +1470,11 @@ static void pnv_machine_power8_class_init(ObjectClass 
> *oc, void *data)
>  static void pnv_machine_power9_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>  {
>      MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
> +    XiveFabricClass *xfc = XIVE_FABRIC_CLASS(oc);
>  
>      mc->desc = "IBM PowerNV (Non-Virtualized) POWER9";
>      mc->default_cpu_type = POWERPC_CPU_TYPE_NAME("power9_v2.0");
> +    xfc->match_nvt = pnv_xive_match_nvt;
>  
>      mc->alias = "powernv";
>  }
> @@ -1495,6 +1526,7 @@ static void pnv_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, 
> void *data)
>          .interfaces = (InterfaceInfo[]) {               \
>              { TYPE_XICS_FABRIC },                       \
>              { TYPE_INTERRUPT_STATS_PROVIDER },          \
> +            { TYPE_XIVE_FABRIC },                       \
>              { },                                        \
>          },                                              \
>      }




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]