[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 24/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move set_irq from SpaprIrq to Sp
From: |
Greg Kurz |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 24/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move set_irq from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Sep 2019 09:22:16 +0200 |
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 12:41:39 +1000
David Gibson <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 04:27:12PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:50:19 +1000
> > David Gibson <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > > This method depends only on the active irq controller. Now that we've
> > > formalized the notion of active controller we can dispatch directly
> > > through
> > > that, rather than dispatching via SpaprIrq with the dual version having
> > > to do a second conditional dispatch.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > > hw/intc/spapr_xive.c | 12 +++++++++++
> > > hw/intc/xics_spapr.c | 9 +++++++++
> > > hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c | 41 ++++++++++----------------------------
> > > include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h | 4 +++-
> > > 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c b/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c
> > > index ff1a175b44..52d5e71793 100644
> > > --- a/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c
> > > +++ b/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c
> > > @@ -553,6 +553,17 @@ static int
> > > spapr_xive_cpu_intc_create(SpaprInterruptController *intc,
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void spapr_xive_set_irq(SpaprInterruptController *intc, int irq,
> > > int val)
> > > +{
> > > + SpaprXive *xive = SPAPR_XIVE(intc);
> > > +
> > > + if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
> > > + kvmppc_xive_source_set_irq(&xive->source, irq, val);
> > > + } else {
> > > + xive_source_set_irq(&xive->source, irq, val);
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static void spapr_xive_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> > > {
> > > DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> > > @@ -574,6 +585,7 @@ static void spapr_xive_class_init(ObjectClass *klass,
> > > void *data)
> > > sicc->cpu_intc_create = spapr_xive_cpu_intc_create;
> > > sicc->claim_irq = spapr_xive_claim_irq;
> > > sicc->free_irq = spapr_xive_free_irq;
> > > + sicc->set_irq = spapr_xive_set_irq;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static const TypeInfo spapr_xive_info = {
> > > diff --git a/hw/intc/xics_spapr.c b/hw/intc/xics_spapr.c
> > > index 224fe1efcd..02372697f6 100644
> > > --- a/hw/intc/xics_spapr.c
> > > +++ b/hw/intc/xics_spapr.c
> > > @@ -373,6 +373,14 @@ static void
> > > xics_spapr_free_irq(SpaprInterruptController *intc, int irq)
> > > memset(&ics->irqs[srcno], 0, sizeof(ICSIRQState));
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void xics_spapr_set_irq(SpaprInterruptController *intc, int irq,
> > > int val)
> > > +{
> > > + ICSState *ics = ICS_SPAPR(intc);
> > > + uint32_t srcno = irq - ics->offset;
> > > +
> > > + ics_set_irq(ics, srcno, val);
> >
> > And we have:
> >
> > void ics_set_irq(void *opaque, int srcno, int val)
> > {
> > ICSState *ics = (ICSState *)opaque;
> >
> > if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
> > ics_kvm_set_irq(ics, srcno, val);
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > if (ics->irqs[srcno].flags & XICS_FLAGS_IRQ_LSI) {
> > ics_set_irq_lsi(ics, srcno, val);
> > } else {
> > ics_set_irq_msi(ics, srcno, val);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > The kvm_irqchip_in_kernel() block would fit better in xics_spapr_set_irq(),
> > like it is already the case for XIVE.
>
> Hmm.. I don't really see why you say that.
>
I mean this:
static void xics_spapr_set_irq(SpaprInterruptController *intc, int irq, int val)
{
IcsSpapr *icss = ICS_SPAPR(intc);
ICSState *ics = &icss->parent;
uint32_t srcno = irq - ics->offset;
if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
ics_kvm_set_irq(ics, srcno, val);
} else {
ics_set_irq(ics, srcno, val);
}
}
It is very similar to spapr_xive_set_irq() and looks nicer to me.
> > Maybe do it now while here ?
> >
> > Anyway,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
> >
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static void ics_spapr_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> > > {
> > > DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> > > @@ -384,6 +392,7 @@ static void ics_spapr_class_init(ObjectClass *klass,
> > > void *data)
> > > sicc->cpu_intc_create = xics_spapr_cpu_intc_create;
> > > sicc->claim_irq = xics_spapr_claim_irq;
> > > sicc->free_irq = xics_spapr_free_irq;
> > > + sicc->set_irq = xics_spapr_set_irq;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static const TypeInfo ics_spapr_info = {
> > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> > > index dfa875b7cd..4922062908 100644
> > > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> > > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> > > @@ -123,14 +123,6 @@ static int
> > > spapr_irq_post_load_xics(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int version_id)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void spapr_irq_set_irq_xics(void *opaque, int irq, int val)
> > > -{
> > > - SpaprMachineState *spapr = opaque;
> > > - uint32_t srcno = irq - spapr->ics->offset;
> > > -
> > > - ics_set_irq(spapr->ics, srcno, val);
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > static void spapr_irq_reset_xics(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error **errp)
> > > {
> > > Error *local_err = NULL;
> > > @@ -159,7 +151,6 @@ SpaprIrq spapr_irq_xics = {
> > > .dt_populate = spapr_dt_xics,
> > > .post_load = spapr_irq_post_load_xics,
> > > .reset = spapr_irq_reset_xics,
> > > - .set_irq = spapr_irq_set_irq_xics,
> > > .init_kvm = spapr_irq_init_kvm_xics,
> > > };
> > >
> > > @@ -208,17 +199,6 @@ static void spapr_irq_reset_xive(SpaprMachineState
> > > *spapr, Error **errp)
> > > spapr_xive_mmio_set_enabled(spapr->xive, true);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void spapr_irq_set_irq_xive(void *opaque, int irq, int val)
> > > -{
> > > - SpaprMachineState *spapr = opaque;
> > > -
> > > - if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
> > > - kvmppc_xive_source_set_irq(&spapr->xive->source, irq, val);
> > > - } else {
> > > - xive_source_set_irq(&spapr->xive->source, irq, val);
> > > - }
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > static void spapr_irq_init_kvm_xive(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error
> > > **errp)
> > > {
> > > if (kvm_enabled()) {
> > > @@ -236,7 +216,6 @@ SpaprIrq spapr_irq_xive = {
> > > .dt_populate = spapr_dt_xive,
> > > .post_load = spapr_irq_post_load_xive,
> > > .reset = spapr_irq_reset_xive,
> > > - .set_irq = spapr_irq_set_irq_xive,
> > > .init_kvm = spapr_irq_init_kvm_xive,
> > > };
> > >
> > > @@ -316,13 +295,6 @@ static void spapr_irq_reset_dual(SpaprMachineState
> > > *spapr, Error **errp)
> > > spapr_irq_current(spapr)->reset(spapr, errp);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void spapr_irq_set_irq_dual(void *opaque, int irq, int val)
> > > -{
> > > - SpaprMachineState *spapr = opaque;
> > > -
> > > - spapr_irq_current(spapr)->set_irq(spapr, irq, val);
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > /*
> > > * Define values in sync with the XIVE and XICS backend
> > > */
> > > @@ -336,7 +308,6 @@ SpaprIrq spapr_irq_dual = {
> > > .dt_populate = spapr_irq_dt_populate_dual,
> > > .post_load = spapr_irq_post_load_dual,
> > > .reset = spapr_irq_reset_dual,
> > > - .set_irq = spapr_irq_set_irq_dual,
> > > .init_kvm = NULL, /* should not be used */
> > > };
> > >
> > > @@ -422,6 +393,15 @@ int spapr_irq_cpu_intc_create(SpaprMachineState
> > > *spapr,
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void spapr_set_irq(void *opaque, int irq, int level)
> > > +{
> > > + SpaprMachineState *spapr = SPAPR_MACHINE(opaque);
> > > + SpaprInterruptControllerClass *sicc
> > > + = SPAPR_INTC_GET_CLASS(spapr->active_intc);
> > > +
> > > + sicc->set_irq(spapr->active_intc, irq, level);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > void spapr_irq_init(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error **errp)
> > > {
> > > MachineState *machine = MACHINE(spapr);
> > > @@ -510,7 +490,7 @@ void spapr_irq_init(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error
> > > **errp)
> > > spapr_xive_hcall_init(spapr);
> > > }
> > >
> > > - spapr->qirqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(spapr->irq->set_irq, spapr,
> > > + spapr->qirqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(spapr_set_irq, spapr,
> > > spapr->irq->nr_xirqs +
> > > SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE);
> > >
> > > out:
> > > @@ -744,7 +724,6 @@ SpaprIrq spapr_irq_xics_legacy = {
> > > .dt_populate = spapr_dt_xics,
> > > .post_load = spapr_irq_post_load_xics,
> > > .reset = spapr_irq_reset_xics,
> > > - .set_irq = spapr_irq_set_irq_xics,
> > > .init_kvm = spapr_irq_init_kvm_xics,
> > > };
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> > > index 3102d152b2..8286a9aa63 100644
> > > --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> > > +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> > > @@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ typedef struct SpaprInterruptControllerClass {
> > > int (*claim_irq)(SpaprInterruptController *intc, int irq, bool lsi,
> > > Error **errp);
> > > void (*free_irq)(SpaprInterruptController *intc, int irq);
> > > +
> > > + /* These methods should only be called on the active intc */
> > > + void (*set_irq)(SpaprInterruptController *intc, int irq, int val);
> > > } SpaprInterruptControllerClass;
> > >
> > > void spapr_irq_update_active_intc(SpaprMachineState *spapr);
> > > @@ -83,7 +86,6 @@ typedef struct SpaprIrq {
> > > void *fdt, uint32_t phandle);
> > > int (*post_load)(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int version_id);
> > > void (*reset)(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error **errp);
> > > - void (*set_irq)(void *opaque, int srcno, int val);
> > > void (*init_kvm)(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error **errp);
> > > } SpaprIrq;
> > >
> >
>
pgpNMn5PQqp4S.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/33] spapr: Clarify and fix handling of nr_irqs, (continued)
- [PATCH v2 12/33] spapr: Simplify spapr_qirq() handling, David Gibson, 2019/09/27
- [PATCH v2 16/33] spapr, xics, xive: Better use of assert()s on irq claim/free paths, David Gibson, 2019/09/27
- [PATCH v2 23/33] spapr: Formalize notion of active interrupt controller, David Gibson, 2019/09/27
- [PATCH v2 19/33] spapr: Eliminate SpaprIrq::init hook, David Gibson, 2019/09/27
- [PATCH v2 24/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move set_irq from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController, David Gibson, 2019/09/27
- Re: [PATCH v2 24/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move set_irq from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController, Greg Kurz, 2019/09/27
- Re: [PATCH v2 24/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move set_irq from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController, David Gibson, 2019/09/30
- Re: [PATCH v2 24/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move set_irq from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController,
Greg Kurz <=
- Re: [PATCH v2 24/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move set_irq from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController, David Gibson, 2019/09/30
- Re: [PATCH v2 24/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move set_irq from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController, Cédric Le Goater, 2019/09/30
[PATCH v2 25/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move print_info from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController, David Gibson, 2019/09/27
[PATCH v2 28/33] spapr: Remove SpaprIrq::init_kvm hook, David Gibson, 2019/09/27
[PATCH v2 27/33] spapr, xics, xive: Match signatures for XICS and XIVE KVM connect routines, David Gibson, 2019/09/27