[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/7] target/ppc: DFP fixes and improvements
|
From: |
Mark Cave-Ayland |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/7] target/ppc: DFP fixes and improvements |
|
Date: |
Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:37:41 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 |
On 24/09/2019 17:30, Paul Clarke wrote:
> Mark,
>
> What tree / branch would these patches apply to? (I've tried qemu master,
> dgibson master and ppc-for-4.2, or I'm doing something wrong.)
>
> PC
Hi Paul,
I've just checked my local repo and I can confirm they are based on qemu master
commit 8dc57281b8 "Merge remote-tracking branch
'remotes/cleber/tags/python-next-pull-request' into staging".
ATB,
Mark.
- Re: [PATCH 6/7] target/ppc: use existing VsrD() macro to eliminate HI_IDX and LO_IDX from dfp_helper.c, (continued)
[PATCH 4/7] target/ppc: introduce dfp_finalize_decimal{64, 128}() helper functions, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2019/09/24
[PATCH 5/7] target/ppc: change struct PPC_DFP decimal storage from uint64[2] to ppc_vsr_t, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2019/09/24
[PATCH 7/7] target/ppc: remove unnecessary if() around calls to set_dfp{64, 128}() in DFP macros, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2019/09/24
Re: [PATCH 0/7] target/ppc: DFP fixes and improvements, Paul Clarke, 2019/09/24
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] target/ppc: DFP fixes and improvements,
Mark Cave-Ayland <=