[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/3] spapr: split the IRQ allocation sequence
From: |
Greg Kurz |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/3] spapr: split the IRQ allocation sequence |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:52:17 +0200 |
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 19:21:19 +0200
Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 06/15/2018 03:14 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 13:53:01 +0200
> > Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> Today, when a device requests for IRQ number in a sPAPR machine, the
> >> spapr_irq_alloc() routine first scans the ICSState status array to
> >> find an empty slot and then performs the assignement of the selected
> >> numbers. Split this sequence in two distinct routines : spapr_irq_find()
> >> for lookups and spapr_irq_claim() for claiming the IRQ numbers.
> >>
> >> This will ease the introduction of a static layout of IRQ numbers.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >> include/hw/ppc/spapr.h | 5 ++++
> >> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 64
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> hw/ppc/spapr_events.c | 18 ++++++++++----
> >> hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c | 19 ++++++++++++---
> >> hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c | 10 +++++++-
> >> 5 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> >> index 3388750fc795..6088f44c1b2a 100644
> >> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> >> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> >> @@ -776,6 +776,11 @@ int spapr_irq_alloc(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int
> >> irq_hint, bool lsi,
> >> Error **errp);
> >> int spapr_irq_alloc_block(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int num, bool lsi,
> >> bool align, Error **errp);
> >> +int spapr_irq_find(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int num, bool align,
> >> + Error **errp);
> >> +#define spapr_irq_findone(spapr, errp) spapr_irq_find(spapr, 1, false,
> >> errp)
> >> +int spapr_irq_claim(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int irq, int num, bool lsi,
> >> + Error **errp);
> >> void spapr_irq_free(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int irq, int num);
> >> qemu_irq spapr_qirq(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int irq);
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> >> index f59999daacfc..b1d19b328166 100644
> >> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> >> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> >> @@ -3810,6 +3810,36 @@ static int ics_find_free_block(ICSState *ics, int
> >> num, int alignnum)
> >> return -1;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +int spapr_irq_find(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int num, bool align, Error
> >> **errp)
> >> +{
> >> + ICSState *ics = spapr->ics;
> >> + int first = -1;
> >> +
> >> + assert(ics);
> >> +
> >> + /*
> >> + * MSIMesage::data is used for storing VIRQ so
> >> + * it has to be aligned to num to support multiple
> >> + * MSI vectors. MSI-X is not affected by this.
> >> + * The hint is used for the first IRQ, the rest should
> >> + * be allocated continuously.
> >> + */
> >> + if (align) {
> >> + assert((num == 1) || (num == 2) || (num == 4) ||
> >> + (num == 8) || (num == 16) || (num == 32));
> >> + first = ics_find_free_block(ics, num, num);
> >> + } else {
> >> + first = ics_find_free_block(ics, num, 1);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (first < 0) {
> >> + error_setg(errp, "can't find a free %d-IRQ block", num);
> >> + return -1;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return first + ics->offset;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> /*
> >> * Allocate the IRQ number and set the IRQ type, LSI or MSI
> >> */
> >> @@ -3888,6 +3918,40 @@ int spapr_irq_alloc_block(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> >> int num, bool lsi,
> >> return first;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +int spapr_irq_claim(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int irq, int num, bool lsi,
> >> + Error **errp)
> >> +{
> >> + ICSState *ics = spapr->ics;
> >> + int i;
> >> + int srcno = irq - ics->offset;
> >> + int ret = 0;
> >> +
> >> + assert(ics);
> >> +
> >> + if (!ics_valid_irq(ics, irq) || !ics_valid_irq(ics, irq + num)) {
> >
> > I guess it is okay to assume that if the first and last irqs are valid,
> > so are all numbers in between. Shouldn't the second check be against
> > irq + num - 1 though ?
>
> yes. thanks.
>
> > This lacks an error_setg() BTW.
> >
> >> + return -1;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + for (i = srcno; i < srcno + num; ++i) {
> >> + if (ICS_IRQ_FREE(ics, i)) {
> >> + spapr_irq_set_lsi(spapr, i + ics->offset, lsi);
> >> + } else {
> >> + error_setg(errp, "IRQ %d is not free", i + ics->offset);
> >> + ret = -1;
> >> + break;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + /* we could call spapr_irq_free() when rolling back */
> >> + if (ret) {
> >> + while (--i >= srcno) {
> >> + memset(&ics->irqs[i], 0, sizeof(ICSIRQState));
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >
> > Hmm... I guess we should free the whole range otherwise we leak
> > srcno + num - i irqs, preferably using spapr_irq_free() to match
> > the traces from spapr_irq_alloc().
>
> I don't understand. This is undoing what has been done.
>
Oops sorry... I got confused by the suggestion to use spapr_irq_free().
So, indeed, rollback is okay. Only thing to address would be to have
matching traces in spapr_irq_claim() and spapr_irq_free() I guess.
> > Alternatively, the rollback could be pushed to the callers.
>
> Yes. Today none is done so we might just do nothing about it
> and return an error.
>
> > Rest looks good.
> >
> >> +
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> void spapr_irq_free(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int irq, int num)
> >> {
> >> ICSState *ics = spapr->ics;
> >> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c
> >> index 86836f0626dc..3b6ae7272092 100644
> >> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c
> >> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c
> >> @@ -707,13 +707,18 @@ void spapr_clear_pending_events(sPAPRMachineState
> >> *spapr)
> >>
> >> void spapr_events_init(sPAPRMachineState *spapr)
> >> {
> >> + int epow_irq;
> >> +
> >> + epow_irq = spapr_irq_findone(spapr, &error_fatal);
> >> +
> >> + spapr_irq_claim(spapr, epow_irq, 1, false, &error_fatal);
> >> +
> >> QTAILQ_INIT(&spapr->pending_events);
> >>
> >> spapr->event_sources = spapr_event_sources_new();
> >>
> >> spapr_event_sources_register(spapr->event_sources, EVENT_CLASS_EPOW,
> >> - spapr_irq_alloc(spapr, 0, false,
> >> - &error_fatal));
> >> + epow_irq);
> >>
> >> /* NOTE: if machine supports modern/dedicated hotplug event source,
> >> * we add it to the device-tree unconditionally. This means we may
> >> @@ -724,9 +729,14 @@ void spapr_events_init(sPAPRMachineState *spapr)
> >> * checking that it's enabled.
> >> */
> >> if (spapr->use_hotplug_event_source) {
> >> + int hp_irq;
> >> +
> >> + hp_irq = spapr_irq_findone(spapr, &error_fatal);
> >> +
> >> + spapr_irq_claim(spapr, hp_irq, 1, false, &error_fatal);
> >> +
> >> spapr_event_sources_register(spapr->event_sources,
> >> EVENT_CLASS_HOT_PLUG,
> >> - spapr_irq_alloc(spapr, 0, false,
> >> - &error_fatal));
> >> + hp_irq);
> >> }
> >>
> >> spapr->epow_notifier.notify = spapr_powerdown_req;
> >> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> >> index f936ce63effa..7394c62b4a8b 100644
> >> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> >> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> >> @@ -371,8 +371,14 @@ static void rtas_ibm_change_msi(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> >> sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> >> }
> >>
> >> /* Allocate MSIs */
> >> - irq = spapr_irq_alloc_block(spapr, req_num, false,
> >> - ret_intr_type == RTAS_TYPE_MSI, &err);
> >> + irq = spapr_irq_find(spapr, req_num, ret_intr_type == RTAS_TYPE_MSI,
> >> &err);
> >> + if (err) {
> >> + error_reportf_err(err, "Can't allocate MSIs for device %x: ",
> >> + config_addr);
> >> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR);
> >> + return;
> >> + }
> >> + spapr_irq_claim(spapr, irq, req_num, false, &err);
> >> if (err) {
> >> error_reportf_err(err, "Can't allocate MSIs for device %x: ",
> >> config_addr);
> >> @@ -1698,7 +1704,14 @@ static void spapr_phb_realize(DeviceState *dev,
> >> Error **errp)
> >> uint32_t irq;
> >> Error *local_err = NULL;
> >>
> >> - irq = spapr_irq_alloc_block(spapr, 1, true, false, &local_err);
> >> + irq = spapr_irq_findone(spapr, &local_err);
> >> + if (local_err) {
> >> + error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> >> + error_prepend(errp, "can't allocate LSIs: ");
> >> + return;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + spapr_irq_claim(spapr, irq, 1, true, &local_err);
> >> if (local_err) {
> >> error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> >> error_prepend(errp, "can't allocate LSIs: ");
> >> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
> >> index 4555c648a8e2..ad9b56e28447 100644
> >> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
> >> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c
> >> @@ -475,7 +475,15 @@ static void spapr_vio_busdev_realize(DeviceState
> >> *qdev, Error **errp)
> >> dev->qdev.id = id;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - dev->irq = spapr_irq_alloc(spapr, dev->irq, false, &local_err);
> >> + if (!dev->irq) {
> >> + dev->irq = spapr_irq_findone(spapr, &local_err);
> >> + if (local_err) {
> >> + error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> >> + return;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + spapr_irq_claim(spapr, dev->irq, 1, false, &local_err);
> >> if (local_err) {
> >> error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> >> return;
> >
>
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 2/3] spapr: remove unused spapr_irq routines, Cédric Le Goater, 2018/06/15
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 3/3] spapr: introduce a fixed IRQ number space, Cédric Le Goater, 2018/06/15