[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 4/4] spapr: introduce a new IRQ backend using fixe
From: |
Greg Kurz |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 4/4] spapr: introduce a new IRQ backend using fixed IRQ number ranges |
Date: |
Mon, 28 May 2018 17:18:33 +0200 |
On Fri, 18 May 2018 18:44:05 +0200
Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> wrote:
> The proposed layout of the IRQ number space is organized as follow :
>
> RANGES DEVICES
>
> 0x0000 - 0x0FFF Reserved for future use (IPI = 2)
> 0x1000 - 0x1000 1 EPOW
> 0x1001 - 0x1001 1 HOTPLUG
> 0x1002 - 0x10FF unused
> 0x1100 - 0x11FF 256 VIO devices (1 IRQ each)
> 0x1200 - 0x1283 32 PCI LSI devices (4 IRQs each)
> 0x1284 - 0x13FF unused
> 0x1400 - 0x17FF PCI MSI device 1 (1024 IRQs each)
> 0x1800 - 0x1BFF PCI MSI device 1
device 2 and...
> 0x1c00 - 0x1FFF PCI MSI device 2
device 3 ?
>
> 0x2000 .... not allocated. Need to increase NR_IRQS
>
What's NR_IRQS ? What's the goal to have several 1k ranges ?
So that each one may be affected to a single device ?
> The MSI range is a bit more complex to handle as the IRQS are dynamically
> allocated by the guest OS. In consequence, we use a bitmap allocator
> under the machine for these.
>
> The XICS IRQ number space is increased to 4K, which gives three MSI
> ranges of 1K for the PHBs. The XICS source IRQ numbers still have the
> 4K offset.
>
Why ?
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
> ---
> include/hw/ppc/spapr.h | 2 +
> include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h | 12 +++
> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 22 +++++
> hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c | 220
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 255 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> index 4eb212b16a51..fcc1b1c1451d 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> @@ -165,6 +165,8 @@ struct sPAPRMachineState {
> char *kvm_type;
> MemoryHotplugState hotplug_memory;
>
> + int32_t nr_irqs;
> + unsigned long *irq_map;
> const char *icp_type;
>
> bool cmd_line_caps[SPAPR_CAP_NUM];
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> index caf4c33d4cec..d1af4c4d11ba 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> @@ -22,8 +22,16 @@
> #define SPAPR_IRQ_PCI_MSI 0x1400 /* 1K IRQs per device covered by
> * a bitmap allocator */
>
> +typedef struct sPAPRPIrqRange {
> + const char *name;
> + uint32_t offset;
> + uint32_t width;
> + uint32_t max_index;
> +} sPAPRPIrqRange;
> +
> typedef struct sPAPRIrq {
> uint32_t nr_irqs;
> + const sPAPRPIrqRange *ranges;
>
> void (*init)(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, Error **errp);
> int (*alloc)(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, uint32_t range, uint32_t index,
> @@ -35,6 +43,10 @@ typedef struct sPAPRIrq {
> } sPAPRIrq;
>
> extern sPAPRIrq spapr_irq_default;
> +extern sPAPRIrq spapr_irq_2_12;
> +
> +const sPAPRPIrqRange *spapr_irq_get_range(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> + uint32_t offset);
>
> int spapr_irq_alloc(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, uint32_t range, uint32_t index,
> Error **errp);
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index 09f095d73eae..f2ebd6f20414 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -1848,6 +1848,24 @@ static const VMStateDescription
> vmstate_spapr_patb_entry = {
> },
> };
>
> +static bool spapr_irq_map_needed(void *opaque)
> +{
> + sPAPRMachineState *spapr = opaque;
> +
> + return spapr->irq_map && !bitmap_empty(spapr->irq_map, spapr->nr_irqs);
> +}
> +
> +static const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_irq_map = {
> + .name = "spapr_irq_map",
> + .version_id = 1,
> + .minimum_version_id = 1,
> + .needed = spapr_irq_map_needed,
> + .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
> + VMSTATE_BITMAP(irq_map, sPAPRMachineState, 0, nr_irqs),
> + VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> + },
> +};
> +
> static const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr = {
> .name = "spapr",
> .version_id = 3,
> @@ -1875,6 +1893,7 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr = {
> &vmstate_spapr_cap_cfpc,
> &vmstate_spapr_cap_sbbc,
> &vmstate_spapr_cap_ibs,
> + &vmstate_spapr_irq_map,
> NULL
> }
> };
> @@ -3916,7 +3935,10 @@ static void
> spapr_machine_2_12_instance_options(MachineState *machine)
>
> static void spapr_machine_2_12_class_options(MachineClass *mc)
> {
> + sPAPRMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_CLASS(mc);
> +
> spapr_machine_2_13_class_options(mc);
> + smc->irq = &spapr_irq_2_12;
> SET_MACHINE_COMPAT(mc, SPAPR_COMPAT_2_12);
> }
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> index ff6cb1aafd25..bfffb1467336 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static qemu_irq spapr_qirq_2_12(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> int irq)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -sPAPRIrq spapr_irq_default = {
> +sPAPRIrq spapr_irq_2_12 = {
> .nr_irqs = XICS_IRQS_SPAPR,
> .init = spapr_irq_init_2_12,
> .alloc = spapr_irq_alloc_2_12,
> @@ -201,6 +201,224 @@ sPAPRIrq spapr_irq_default = {
> .qirq = spapr_qirq_2_12,
> };
>
> +/*
> + * IRQ range helpers for new IRQ backends
> + */
> +const sPAPRPIrqRange *spapr_irq_get_range(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> + uint32_t offset)
> +{
> + sPAPRMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr);
> + const sPAPRPIrqRange *range = smc->irq->ranges;
> +
> + if (range) {
> + while (range->name && range->offset != offset) {
> + range++;
> + }
> +
> + if (!range->name) {
> + return NULL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return range;
> +}
> +
> +static int spapr_irq_get_base(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, uint32_t offset,
> + uint32_t index, Error **errp)
> +{
> + const sPAPRPIrqRange *range = spapr_irq_get_range(spapr, offset);
> +
> + if (!range) {
> + error_setg(errp, "Invalid IRQ range %x", offset);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + if (index > range->max_index) {
> + error_setg(errp, "Index %d too big for IRQ range %s", index,
> + range->name);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + return range->offset + index * range->width;
> +}
> +
> +static int spapr_irq_range_alloc(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> + uint32_t range, uint32_t index, Error
> **errp)
> +{
> + return spapr_irq_get_base(spapr, range, index, errp);
> +}
> +
> +static int spapr_irq_range_alloc_msi(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, uint32_t
> range,
> + uint32_t index, int num, bool align,
> + Error **errp)
> +{
> + int msi_base = spapr_irq_get_base(spapr, SPAPR_IRQ_PCI_MSI, index, errp);
> + int irq;
> +
> + /*
> + * The 'align_mask' parameter of bitmap_find_next_zero_area()
> + * should be one less than a power of 2; 0 means no
> + * alignment. Adapt the 'align' value of the former allocator
> + * to fit the requirements of bitmap_find_next_zero_area()
> + */
> + align -= 1;
> +
> + irq = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(spapr->irq_map, spapr->nr_irqs,
> + msi_base, num, align);
> + if (irq == spapr->nr_irqs) {
> + error_setg(errp, "can't find a free MSI %d-IRQ block", num);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + bitmap_set(spapr->irq_map, irq, num);
> + return irq;
> +}
> +
> +static void spapr_irq_range_free_msi(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int irq, int
> num)
> +{
> + bitmap_clear(spapr->irq_map, irq, num);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * New XICS IRQ backend
> + *
> + * using the IRQ ranges and device indexes
> + */
> +static void spapr_irq_init_2_13(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, Error **errp)
FYI, next QEMU version will likely be 3.0:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-05/msg04879.html
Also, it is useful to add version information to the name in case of
existing machine types. I guess _default or _new is a better choice
here.
> +{
> + MachineState *machine = MACHINE(spapr);
> + sPAPRMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
> +
> + spapr_irq_init_2_12(spapr, errp);
Hmm... it's a bit confusing. I'd rather have each init function to call a
common helper.
> +
> + /*
> + * Initialize the MSI IRQ allocator. The full XICS IRQ number
> + * space is covered even though the bottow IRQ numbers below the
> + * XICS source number offset (4K) are unused and that only MSI IRQ
> + * numbers can be allocated. We does waste some bytes but it makes
> + * things easier. We will optimize later.
> + */
> + spapr->nr_irqs = smc->irq->nr_irqs + spapr->ics->offset;
> + spapr->irq_map = bitmap_new(spapr->nr_irqs);
> +}
> +
> +static int spapr_irq_alloc_2_13(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> + uint32_t range, uint32_t index, Error **errp)
> +{
> + ICSState *ics = spapr->ics;
> + bool lsi = (range == SPAPR_IRQ_PCI_LSI);
> + int irq = spapr_irq_range_alloc(spapr, range, index, errp);
> +
> + if (irq < 0) {
> + return irq;
> + }
> +
> + /* Update the IRQState in the XICS source */
> + ics_set_irq_type(ics, irq - ics->offset, lsi);
> +
> + return irq;
> +}
> +
> +static int spapr_irq_alloc_block_2_13(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, uint32_t
> range,
> + uint32_t index, int num, bool align,
> + Error **errp)
> +{
> + ICSState *ics = spapr->ics;
> + bool lsi = (range == SPAPR_IRQ_PCI_LSI);
> + int irq;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (range == SPAPR_IRQ_PCI_MSI) {
> + irq = spapr_irq_range_alloc_msi(spapr, range, index, num, align,
> errp);
> + } else {
> + /* TODO: check IRQ range width vs. required block size */
> + irq = spapr_irq_range_alloc(spapr, range, index, errp);
> + }
> +
> + if (irq < 0) {
> + return irq;
> + }
> +
> + /* Update the IRQState in the XICS source */
> + for (i = irq; i < irq + num; ++i) {
> + ics_set_irq_type(ics, i - ics->offset, lsi);
> + }
> +
> + return irq;
> +}
> +
> +static void spapr_irq_free_2_13(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int irq, int num,
> + Error **errp)
> +{
> + ICSState *ics = spapr->ics;
> + int msi_base = spapr_irq_get_base(spapr, SPAPR_IRQ_PCI_MSI, 0, NULL);
> + int i;
> +
> + /* Any IRQ below MSI base should not be freed */
> + if (irq < msi_base) {
> + error_setg(errp, "IRQs %x-%x can not be freed", irq, irq + num);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + spapr_irq_range_free_msi(spapr, irq, num);
> +
> + /* Clear out the IRQState from the XICS source */
> + for (i = irq; i < irq + num; ++i) {
> + if (ics_valid_irq(ics, i)) {
> + uint32_t srcno = i - ics->offset;
> + memset(&ics->irqs[srcno], 0, sizeof(ICSIRQState));
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static qemu_irq spapr_qirq_2_13(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int irq)
> +{
> + return spapr_qirq_2_12(spapr, irq);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * RANGES DEVICES
> + *
> + * 0x0000 - 0x0FFF Reserved (IPI = 2)
> + *
> + * 0x1000 - 0x1000 1 EPOW
> + * 0x1001 - 0x1001 1 HOTPLUG
> + * 0x1002 - 0x10FF unused
> + * 0x1100 - 0x11FF 256 VIO devices (1 IRQ each)
> + * 0x1200 - 0x1283 32 PCI LSI devices (4 IRQs each)
> + * 0x1284 - 0x13FF unused
> + * 0x1400 - 0x17FF PCI MSI device 1 (1024 IRQs each)
> + * 0x1800 - 0x1BFF PCI MSI device 1
> + * 0x1c00 - 0x1FFF PCI MSI device 2
> + * 0x2000 .... not allocated. Need to increase NR_IRQS
> + */
> +static const sPAPRPIrqRange spapr_irq_ranges_2_13[] = {
> + /* "IPI" Not used */
> + { "EPOW", SPAPR_IRQ_EPOW, 1, 0 },
> + { "HOTPLUG", SPAPR_IRQ_HOTPLUG, 1, 0 },
> + { "VIO", SPAPR_IRQ_VIO, 1, 0xFF },
> + { "PCI LSI", SPAPR_IRQ_PCI_LSI, PCI_NUM_PINS, 0x1F },
> + { "PCI MSI", SPAPR_IRQ_PCI_MSI, 0x400, 0x1F },
> + { NULL, 0, 0, 0 },
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Increase the XICS IRQ number space to 4K. It gives us 3 possible
> + * MSI ranges for the PHBs. The XICS Source IRQ numbers still have the
> + * 4K offset.
> + */
> +#define SPAPR_NR_IRQS_2_13 0x1000
> +
> +sPAPRIrq spapr_irq_default = {
> + .nr_irqs = SPAPR_NR_IRQS_2_13,
Since there's only one user for this define, why not open-coding the value
here ?
> + .init = spapr_irq_init_2_13,
> + .ranges = spapr_irq_ranges_2_13,
> + .alloc = spapr_irq_alloc_2_13,
> + .alloc_block = spapr_irq_alloc_block_2_13,
> + .free = spapr_irq_free_2_13,
> + .qirq = spapr_qirq_2_13,
> +};
> +
> int spapr_irq_alloc(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, uint32_t range, uint32_t index,
> Error **errp)
> {
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/4] spapr: remove irq_hint parameter from spapr_irq_alloc(), (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/4] spapr: remove irq_hint parameter from spapr_irq_alloc(), Greg Kurz, 2018/05/25
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/4] spapr: remove irq_hint parameter from spapr_irq_alloc(), Thomas Huth, 2018/05/28
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/4] spapr: remove irq_hint parameter from spapr_irq_alloc(), Cédric Le Goater, 2018/05/28
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/4] spapr: remove irq_hint parameter from spapr_irq_alloc(), Thomas Huth, 2018/05/28
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/4] spapr: remove irq_hint parameter from spapr_irq_alloc(), Cédric Le Goater, 2018/05/28
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/4] spapr: remove irq_hint parameter from spapr_irq_alloc(), Greg Kurz, 2018/05/28
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/4] spapr: remove irq_hint parameter from spapr_irq_alloc(), Cédric Le Goater, 2018/05/28
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 3/4] spapr: introduce a generic IRQ frontend to the machine, Cédric Le Goater, 2018/05/18
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 4/4] spapr: introduce a new IRQ backend using fixed IRQ number ranges, Cédric Le Goater, 2018/05/18
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 4/4] spapr: introduce a new IRQ backend using fixed IRQ number ranges,
Greg Kurz <=