qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] spapr: add missing break in h_get_cpu_characteris


From: Daniel Henrique Barboza
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] spapr: add missing break in h_get_cpu_characteristics()
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 09:18:04 -0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2



On 02/02/2018 08:00 AM, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 07:11:08 -0200
Daniel Henrique Barboza <address@hidden> wrote:

On 02/01/2018 05:47 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
Detected by Coverity (CID 1385702). This fixes the recently added hypercall
to let guests properly apply Spectre and Meltdown workarounds.
Paolo Bonzini reported this error in a reply to the pull request that
added the patch:

"Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 12/12] target/ppc/spapr: Add H-Call
H_GET_CPU_CHARACTERISTICS

On 28/01/2018 22:28, David Gibson wrote:

+    switch (safe_indirect_branch) {
+    case SPAPR_CAP_FIXED:
+        characteristics |= H_CPU_CHAR_BCCTRL_SERIALISED;
Missing "break;" here.

Paolo

"

I think it is nice to mention in the commit msg that Paolo also detected
this same error,
specially given that his email was sent before this patch.

Heh, Paolo's mail landed in the pull req thread in my mail client and I saw
it after sending the patch :P ... also I'm pretty sure Paolo was made aware
of this issue by Coverity, just as I was :)

From: address@hidden
To: address@hidden
Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for QEMU
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 18:11:33 +0000 (UTC)

Hi,

Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to QEMU found with
Coverity Scan.

...

*** CID 1385702:  Control flow issues  (MISSING_BREAK)
/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c: 1700 in h_get_cpu_characteristics()
1694             break;
1695         }
1696
1697         switch (safe_indirect_branch) {
1698         case SPAPR_CAP_FIXED:
1699             characteristics |= H_CPU_CHAR_BCCTRL_SERIALISED;
     CID 1385702:  Control flow issues  (MISSING_BREAK)
     The above case falls through to this one.
1700         default: /* broken */
1701             assert(safe_indirect_branch == SPAPR_CAP_BROKEN);
1702             break;
1703         }
1704
1705         args[0] = characteristics;


No big deal I guess :)

Roger that!


Thanks,


Daniel


Fixes: c59704b25473 "target/ppc/spapr: Add H-Call H_GET_CPU_CHARACTERISTICS"
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
---
   hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c |    1 +
   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
index 4d0e6eb0cf1d..596f58378a40 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
@@ -1697,6 +1697,7 @@ static target_ulong h_get_cpu_characteristics(PowerPCCPU 
*cpu,
       switch (safe_indirect_branch) {
       case SPAPR_CAP_FIXED:
           characteristics |= H_CPU_CHAR_BCCTRL_SERIALISED;
+        break;
       default: /* broken */
           assert(safe_indirect_branch == SPAPR_CAP_BROKEN);
           break;





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]