Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 1/1] ppc: spapr: Make VCPU ID handling private to SPAPR

[David Gibson]

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 04:33:29PM +1000, Sam Bobroff wrote:
> The concept of a VCPU ID that differs from the CPU's index
> (cpu->cpu_index) exists only within SPAPR machines so, move the
> functions ppc_get_vcpu_id() and ppc_get_cpu_by_vcpu_id() into spapr.c
> and rename them appropriately.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <address@hidden>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> 
> * Re-arranged so that spapr_vcpu_id() calls kvm_arch_vcpu_id() rather than the
> other way around.

Ah.. so close..

[snip]
> +int spapr_vcpu_id(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
> +{
> +    CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
> +
> +    if (kvm_enabled()) {
> +        return kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cs);
> +    } else {
> +        return cs->cpu_index;
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +PowerPCCPU *spapr_find_cpu(int vcpu_id)
> +{
> +    CPUState *cs;
> +
> +    CPU_FOREACH(cs) {
> +        PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(cs);
> +
> +        if (cpu->vcpu_id == vcpu_id) {

This is still reaching into vcpu_id which should really be cpu
private, not in spapr.  You can use spapr_vcpu_id() which you already
defined to avoid this.

With that done, I believe it should be possible to put cpu->vcpu_id in
an ifdef CONFIG_KVM and have things work.

> +            return cpu;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    return NULL;
> +}

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature