qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2] numa, spapr: align default numa node memory si


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2] numa, spapr: align default numa node memory size to 256MB
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:03:21 +1100
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 04:11:14PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 03:12:44PM +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> > Since commit 224245b ("spapr: Add LMB DR connectors"), NUMA node
> > memory size must be aligned to 256MB (SPAPR_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE).
> > 
> > But when "-numa" option is provided without "mem" parameter,
> > the memory is equally divided between nodes, but 8MB aligned.
> > This can be not valid for pseries.
> > 
> > In that case we can have:
> > $ ./ppc64-softmmu/qemu-system-ppc64 -m 4G -numa node -numa node -numa node
> > qemu-system-ppc64: Node 0 memory size 0x55000000 is not aligned to 256 MiB
> > 
> > With this patch, we have:
> > (qemu) info numa
> > 3 nodes
> > node 0 cpus: 0
> > node 0 size: 1280 MB
> > node 1 cpus:
> > node 1 size: 1280 MB
> > node 2 cpus:
> > node 2 size: 1536 MB
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <address@hidden>

In agree with Eduardo's suggested comment changes.  Apart from that,

Reviewed-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>

Eduardo, do you want to take the final spin through your tree, or
should I take it through mine?

> 
> The code looks good, but a few comments explaining the reason for
> the numa_mem_align_shift values would be interesting. Additional
> comments below:
> 
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - remove dtc
> > - Add a field in MachineClass to only modify the
> >   numa node memory alignment value for pseries-2.9
> >   and upper.
> > 
> >  hw/core/machine.c   | 3 +++
> >  hw/ppc/spapr.c      | 2 ++
> >  include/hw/boards.h | 1 +
> >  numa.c              | 4 ++--
> >  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
> > index 0d92672..2ad5ab5 100644
> > --- a/hw/core/machine.c
> > +++ b/hw/core/machine.c
> > @@ -396,6 +396,9 @@ static void machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void 
> > *data)
> >      mc->default_ram_size = 128 * M_BYTE;
> >      mc->rom_file_has_mr = true;
> >  
> > +    /* numa node memory size aligned on 8MB by default */
> > +    mc->numa_mem_align_shift = 23;
> > +
> 
> This could include the original "On Linux, each node's border has
> to be 8MB aligned" comment from parse_numa_opts(), to explain the
> reason for the 8MB default.
> 
> >      object_class_property_add_str(oc, "accel",
> >          machine_get_accel, machine_set_accel, &error_abort);
> >      object_class_property_set_description(oc, "accel",
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > index 6ee566d..1e72fe8 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > @@ -3096,6 +3096,7 @@ static void spapr_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, 
> > void *data)
> >      xic->ics_resend = spapr_ics_resend;
> >      xic->icp_get = spapr_icp_get;
> >      ispc->print_info = spapr_pic_print_info;
> > +    mc->numa_mem_align_shift = 28;
> 
> A comment explaining why spapr requires 256MB alignment would be
> nice.
> 
> >  }
> >  
> >  static const TypeInfo spapr_machine_info = {
> > @@ -3180,6 +3181,7 @@ static void 
> > spapr_machine_2_8_class_options(MachineClass *mc)
> >  {
> >      spapr_machine_2_9_class_options(mc);
> >      SET_MACHINE_COMPAT(mc, SPAPR_COMPAT_2_8);
> > +    mc->numa_mem_align_shift = 23;
> >  }
> >  
> >  DEFINE_SPAPR_MACHINE(2_8, "2.8", false);
> > diff --git a/include/hw/boards.h b/include/hw/boards.h
> > index 269d0ba..31d9c72 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/boards.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/boards.h
> > @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ struct MachineClass {
> >      bool rom_file_has_mr;
> >      int minimum_page_bits;
> >      bool has_hotpluggable_cpus;
> > +    int numa_mem_align_shift;
> >  
> >      HotplugHandler *(*get_hotplug_handler)(MachineState *machine,
> >                                             DeviceState *dev);
> > diff --git a/numa.c b/numa.c
> > index e01cb54..98e4d02 100644
> > --- a/numa.c
> > +++ b/numa.c
> > @@ -338,12 +338,12 @@ void parse_numa_opts(MachineClass *mc)
> >          if (i == nb_numa_nodes) {
> >              uint64_t usedmem = 0;
> >  
> > -            /* On Linux, each node's border has to be 8MB aligned,
> > +            /* On Linux, each node's border has to be aligned,
> >               * the final node gets the rest.
> >               */
> 
> I assume that the 256MB alignment in spapr is not just because of
> Linux (is it?). This makes the comment misleading.
> 
> I would rewrite it to something like: "Align each node according
> to the alignment requirements of the machine class".
> 
> 
> >              for (i = 0; i < nb_numa_nodes - 1; i++) {
> >                  numa_info[i].node_mem = (ram_size / nb_numa_nodes) &
> > -                                        ~((1 << 23UL) - 1);
> > +                                        ~((1 << mc->numa_mem_align_shift) 
> > - 1);
> >                  usedmem += numa_info[i].node_mem;
> >              }
> >              numa_info[i].node_mem = ram_size - usedmem;
> 

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]