[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 05/10] ppc: Fix generation if ISI/DSI vs. HV mode
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 05/10] ppc: Fix generation if ISI/DSI vs. HV mode |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:34:05 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) |
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:24:51AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <address@hidden>
>
> Under some circumstances, we need to direct ISI and DSI interrupts
> at the hypervisor, turning them into HISI/HDSI, and using different
> SPRs (HDSISR and HDAR) depending on the combination of MSR_DR and
> the corresponding VPM bits in LPCR.
>
> This moves part of the code into helpers that are fixed to select
> the right exception type and registers. On pre-P7 processors, LPCR
> is 0 which provides the old behaviour of directing the interrupts
> at the supervisor.
>
> Thanks to Andrei Warkentin for finding a bug when HV=1
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> ---
> target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c | 69
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c b/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> index 668da5e22653..072a952c8bd5 100644
> --- a/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> +++ b/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c
> @@ -613,6 +613,47 @@ unsigned ppc_hash64_hpte_page_shift_noslb(PowerPCCPU
> *cpu,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void ppc_hash64_set_isi(CPUState *cs, CPUPPCState *env,
> + uint64_t error_code)
> +{
> + bool vpm;
> +
> + if (msr_ir) {
> + vpm = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM1);
> + } else {
> + vpm = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM0);
> + }
> + if (vpm && !msr_hv) {
> + cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_HISI;
In the ISI case, you use HISI if !msr_hv..
> + } else {
> + cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ISI;
> + }
> + env->error_code = error_code;
> +}
> +
> +static void ppc_hash64_set_dsi(CPUState *cs, CPUPPCState *env, uint64_t dar,
> + uint64_t dsisr)
> +{
> + bool vpm;
> +
> + if (msr_dr) {
> + vpm = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM1);
> + } else {
> + vpm = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM0);
> + }
> + if (vpm && msr_hv) {
> + cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_HDSI;
..but in the DSI case you use HDSI if msr_hv. Is that really right?
> + env->spr[SPR_HDAR] = dar;
> + env->spr[SPR_HDSISR] = dsisr;
> + } else {
> + cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_DSI;
> + env->spr[SPR_DAR] = dar;
> + env->spr[SPR_DSISR] = dsisr;
> + }
> + env->error_code = 0;
> +}
> +
> +
> int ppc_hash64_handle_mmu_fault(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr,
> int rwx, int mmu_idx)
> {
> @@ -623,7 +664,7 @@ int ppc_hash64_handle_mmu_fault(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr
> eaddr,
> hwaddr pte_offset;
> ppc_hash_pte64_t pte;
> int pp_prot, amr_prot, prot;
> - uint64_t new_pte1;
> + uint64_t new_pte1, dsisr;
> const int need_prot[] = {PAGE_READ, PAGE_WRITE, PAGE_EXEC};
> hwaddr raddr;
>
> @@ -657,26 +698,21 @@ int ppc_hash64_handle_mmu_fault(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr
> eaddr,
>
> /* 3. Check for segment level no-execute violation */
> if ((rwx == 2) && (slb->vsid & SLB_VSID_N)) {
> - cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ISI;
> - env->error_code = 0x10000000;
> + ppc_hash64_set_isi(cs, env, 0x10000000);
> return 1;
> }
>
> /* 4. Locate the PTE in the hash table */
> pte_offset = ppc_hash64_htab_lookup(cpu, slb, eaddr, &pte);
> if (pte_offset == -1) {
> + dsisr = 0x40000000;
> if (rwx == 2) {
> - cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ISI;
> - env->error_code = 0x40000000;
> + ppc_hash64_set_isi(cs, env, dsisr);
> } else {
> - cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_DSI;
> - env->error_code = 0;
> - env->spr[SPR_DAR] = eaddr;
> if (rwx == 1) {
> - env->spr[SPR_DSISR] = 0x42000000;
> - } else {
> - env->spr[SPR_DSISR] = 0x40000000;
> + dsisr |= 0x02000000;
> }
> + ppc_hash64_set_dsi(cs, env, eaddr, dsisr);
> }
> return 1;
> }
> @@ -705,14 +741,9 @@ int ppc_hash64_handle_mmu_fault(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr
> eaddr,
> /* Access right violation */
> qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, "PTE access rejected\n");
> if (rwx == 2) {
> - cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ISI;
> - env->error_code = 0x08000000;
> + ppc_hash64_set_isi(cs, env, 0x08000000);
> } else {
> - target_ulong dsisr = 0;
> -
> - cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_DSI;
> - env->error_code = 0;
> - env->spr[SPR_DAR] = eaddr;
> + dsisr = 0;
> if (need_prot[rwx] & ~pp_prot) {
> dsisr |= 0x08000000;
> }
> @@ -722,7 +753,7 @@ int ppc_hash64_handle_mmu_fault(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr
> eaddr,
> if (need_prot[rwx] & ~amr_prot) {
> dsisr |= 0x00200000;
> }
> - env->spr[SPR_DSISR] = dsisr;
> + ppc_hash64_set_dsi(cs, env, eaddr, dsisr);
> }
> return 1;
> }
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 04/10] ppc: Fix POWER7 and POWER8 exception definitions, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/13
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 05/10] ppc: Fix generation if ISI/DSI vs. HV mode, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/13
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 05/10] ppc: Fix generation if ISI/DSI vs. HV mode,
David Gibson <=
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 06/10] ppc: Rework generation of priv and inval interrupts, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/13
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 07/10] ppc: Add real mode CI load/store instructions for P7 and P8, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/13
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 08/10] ppc: Turn a bunch of booleans from int to bool, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/13
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 09/10] ppc: Move exception generation code out of line, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/13