qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] target-ppc: Add versions to server CPU descriptio


From: Alexey Kardashevskiy
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] target-ppc: Add versions to server CPU descriptions
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 10:26:24 +1100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0

On 03/05/2015 01:14 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Alex,

Am 04.03.2015 um 13:28 schrieb Alexander Graf:
On 04.03.15 02:31, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
5b79b1c "target-ppc: Create versionless CPU class per family if KVM" added
a dynamic CPU class registration with the name of the CPU family which
QEMU is running on. For example, this allowed specifying "-cpu POWER7"
on every version of POWER7 machine, not just the one which POWER7 was
an alias of. I.e. before 5b79b1c, "-cpu POWER7" would not work on real
POWER7 2.1 and would work on POWER7 2.3 only. The same story for POWER8.

However that patch broke POWER5+ support as POWER5+ CPU uses the same
name as the CPU class so dynamic registering of the POWER5+ class failed.

This redefines POWER5+ server CPUs by adding a version to them and adding
an alias for TCG case. KVM will use dynamically registered CPUs.

While we are here, do the same for 970 CPU.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>

Thanks, applied to ppc-next.

As Alexey predicted, I object.

The 970 part looks good and could be applied immediately if it were a
separate patch.

But the POWER5+ part I have my doubts about: Was there really a v0.0???
Others start with v1.0 and I have:

revision        : 2.1 (pvr 003b 0201)

Also, this is still just bandaid and not a fix to the code that I
pointed out.

Does QEMU work for you now, with this patch? How and where (real power5? power7?) do you run QEMU exactly to hit the bug?


But let's keep that discussion over at the other patch.

oookay :)


--
Alexey



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]