Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] target-ppc: Handle cases when multi-processors get machine-check

[Aravinda Prasad]

On Thursday 28 August 2014 02:12 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> 
> On 28.08.14 08:56, Aravinda Prasad wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday 27 August 2014 04:10 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 25.08.14 15:45, Aravinda Prasad wrote:
>>>> It is possible for multi-processors to experience machine
>>>> check at or about the same time. As per PAPR, subsequent
>>>> processors serialize waiting for the first processor to
>>>> issue the ibm,nmi-interlock call.
>>>>
>>>> The second processor retries if the first processor which
>>>> received a machine check is still reading the error log
>>>> and is yet to issue ibm,nmi-interlock call.
>>>>
>>>> This patch implements this functionality.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Aravinda Prasad <address@hidden>
>>>
>>> This patch doesn't make any sense. Both threads will issue an HCALL
>>> which will get locked inside of QEMU, so we'll never see the case where
>>> both hypercalls get processed at the same time.
>>
>> AFAIK, only one thread can succeed entering qemu upon parallel hcall
>> from different guest CPUs as it is gated by a lock. Hence one hcall is
>> processed at a time.
>>
>> As per PAPR, we don't want any other KVMPPC_H_REPORT_ERR hcall to be
>> processed at the same time and further KVMPPC_H_REPORT_ERR hcall thus
>> issued should wait until the OS issues ibm,nmi-interlock.
> 
> Oh, now I understand. The locking time is from
> [h_report_mc_err...rtas_ibm_nmi_interlock].
> 
> This should definitely go into the comment on the check in
> h_report_mc_err. In fact, remove the fact that only one thread can
> execute and instead write where the lock gets unset and that during that
> phase only one vcpu may process the NMI.

Sure will add a comment.

Regards,
Aravinda

> 
> 
> Alex
> 

-- 
Regards,
Aravinda