qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH for-2.0 2/2] ohw: let the right reset entry point


From: Alexander Graf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH for-2.0 2/2] ohw: let the right reset entry point 0xfff00100 jump to the currently wrong entry point (0xfffffffc)
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 07:45:14 +0200


> Am 02.04.2014 um 07:36 schrieb Alexander Graf <address@hidden>:
> 
> 
> 
>> Am 02.04.2014 um 07:23 schrieb Hervé Poussineau <address@hidden>:
>> 
>> Le mer. 02 avril 2014 07:14:48 CEST, Alexander Graf a écrit :
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Am 01.04.2014 um 23:18 schrieb Hervé Poussineau <address@hidden>:
>>>> 
>>>> This is easier to do this than to copy the code from the wrong entry point 
>>>> to the right entry point.
>>>> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hervé Poussineau <address@hidden>
>>>> ---
>>>> src/vectors.S |    7 ++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/src/vectors.S b/src/vectors.S
>>>> index 691d568..05cd1d9 100644
>>>> --- a/src/vectors.S
>>>> +++ b/src/vectors.S
>>>> @@ -121,7 +121,12 @@ excp_##entry##:                                       
>>>>     ; \
>>>> 
>>>>        /* Exception vectors */
>>>>        /* Reset exception */
>>>> -        EXCP_BUG(0100)                                    ;
>>>> +.org 0x0100
>>>> +excp_0100:
>>>> +        lis r3,0
>>>> +        addi r3,r3,-4
>>>> +        mtlr r3
>>>> +        blr
>>> 
>>> Doesn't ba -4 work?
>> 
>> Yes, "ba -4" also works, I just tested it.
> 
> It's a lot cleaner because it doesn't modify registers. I don't think this is 
> 2.0 material either - we're in the "critical bug fixes only" phase already, 
> so no need to rush :).

Oh, and writing it as ba 0xfffffffc should work as well and be even clearer :)


Alex




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]