Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR support in sregs

[Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Graf [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 3:13 PM
> To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
> Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden; linuxppc-
> address@hidden; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR
> support in sregs
> 
> On 07/05/2012 01:49 PM, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Alexander Graf [mailto:address@hidden
> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 4:34 PM
> >> To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
> >> Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden; linuxppc-
> >> address@hidden; address@hidden
> >> Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR
> >> support in sregs
> >>
> >>
> >> On 25.06.2012, at 14:26, Mihai Caraman wrote:
> >>
> >>> Add KVM_SREGS_E_64 feature and EPCR spr support in get/set sregs
> >>> for 64-bit hosts.
> >> Please also implement a ONE_REG interface while at it. Over time, I'd
> >> like to move towards ONE_REG instead of the messy regs/sregs API.
> > ONE_REG doesn't seem to be implemented at all for book3e, I looked at
> > kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_one_reg/kvm_vcpu_ioctl_get_one_reg in booke.c file.
> >
> > I can take care of it soon but in a different patch set. It's ok like
> this?
> 
> Do it in a different patch, but as part of this patch set.

Hmm ... then if you don't disagree I will do it as a prerequisite patch since I 
want
to keep this patchset strictly for 64-bit support.
I am not familiar with ONE_REG, is qemu tailored to use it? I need a way to 
test it.

-Mike