[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-discuss] Guidance requested creating a QEMU MMIO device
From: |
trasmussen |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-discuss] Guidance requested creating a QEMU MMIO device |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Apr 2019 16:48:35 +0200 |
Thanks for the response.
I do see that the 3 mps2_..._class_init() functions are called, but I
don't see mps2_common_init() being called which suggests that the mc->init
field is not called.
Shouldn't there be created an instance which then should be calling
mps2_common_init() where all the initialization takes place?
Shouldn't an instance also be created for my MMIO that follows the same
style and pattern as MPS2?
After the third mps2..class_init() function is called, qemu just starts
up.
That cannot be right, can it?
Thorkil B. Rasmussen
From: "Peter Maydell" <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Cc: "Qemu-discuss"
<address@hidden>, "qemu-discuss"
<address@hidden>
Date: 30-04-2019 16:25
Subject: Re: [Qemu-discuss] Guidance requested creating a QEMU MMIO
device
Sent by: "Qemu-discuss"
<address@hidden>
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 15:09, <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I made some good progress and has been able to create the code for my
MMIO-device borrowing from MPS2, compile and link it.
> When I start qemu with gdb to debug MPS2, I get to mps2_machine_init(),
then to mps2_scc_register_types(), but not to mps2_scc_init() nor to
mps2_common_init().
>
> I know that the cpu is cortex-a53 and it may not have any UARTs at all.
> I was hoping there was a way to introduce a new device on any cpu that
is not 'born' with it from the manufacturer, like I attempt to introduce
the MPS2 on the cortex-a53.
Cortex-A53 is a CPU. This is not related to whethher there's a
UART present or not, which is a question of the design of a
particular SoC or board.
For Cortex-A53 you definitely want to use a different board from
the MPS2, though, because MPS2 is M-profile specific. When
I mentioned it I just meant to say that you could look at the
code in the MPS2 board code that is creating a simple device
and copy the way that works for whatever board it is that
you are using.
> In reality I 'just' need to create a device which is at some physical
memory address (e.g. 0x09070000) and of size 0x1000, and I want to catch
reads and writes to this physical address range in my device and respond
there. My new device is unknown to a real cortex-a53 board.
>
> Is there a way to add such a device, provided that the chosen physical
address range is free?
> Since I may not have created my MMIO-device correctly, I had hoped I
could use MPS2 as debugging subject, so I could verify what is done in
mps2_common_init().
Yes, as I say you can look at the mps2-scc device to see how it
is created and wired up into the memory map.
> I fear that the device-tree is built-in and unique to each cpu
> and cannot be modified in a simple way.
No, the device creation is handled by code for a particular
board, it's not CPU-specific.
thanks
-- PMM