[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-discuss] Puzzling performance comparison with KVM and Hyper-V
From: |
Blair Bethwaite |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-discuss] Puzzling performance comparison with KVM and Hyper-V |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Jul 2015 21:37:12 +1000 |
On 22 July 2015 at 11:00, Blair Bethwaite <address@hidden> wrote:
> Re. Hyper-V, firstly it's interesting that it appears to be pinning
> automatically, or at least doing a much better scheduling job than
> Linux/KVM.
Actually I guess KVM might be made to look quite bad here if you're
pinning it across numa nodes.
It would be interesting to see numbers with no pinning too, if you
have them / are generating more.
--
Cheers,
~Blairo
- [Qemu-discuss] Puzzling performance comparison with KVM and Hyper-V, Tim Bell, 2015/07/21
- Re: [Qemu-discuss] Puzzling performance comparison with KVM and Hyper-V, Carlos Torres, 2015/07/21
- Re: [Qemu-discuss] Puzzling performance comparison with KVM and Hyper-V, Tim Bell, 2015/07/21
- Re: [Qemu-discuss] Puzzling performance comparison with KVM and Hyper-V, Stephan von Krawczynski, 2015/07/21
- Re: [Qemu-discuss] Puzzling performance comparison with KVM and Hyper-V, Tim Bell, 2015/07/21
- Re: [Qemu-discuss] Puzzling performance comparison with KVM and Hyper-V, Carlos Torres, 2015/07/21
- Re: [Qemu-discuss] Puzzling performance comparison with KVM and Hyper-V, Stephan von Krawczynski, 2015/07/21
- Re: [Qemu-discuss] Puzzling performance comparison with KVM and Hyper-V, Tim Bell, 2015/07/21
- Re: [Qemu-discuss] Puzzling performance comparison with KVM and Hyper-V, Blair Bethwaite, 2015/07/21
- Re: [Qemu-discuss] Puzzling performance comparison with KVM and Hyper-V,
Blair Bethwaite <=