Re: [Qemu-discuss] Guest execution statistics from QEMU

[JHM]

Well, I'll humbly apologize for wasting everyone's time :(

Our client connections are coming from Brazil and the server is hosted in Canada. Turns out, the ISP we are using had issues that were resolved last night. I haven't changed any qemu parameters for the last couple of days. Last night we had a brief internet outage at the ISP level. Once it was back, download speeds were back to normal.

Thanks everyone for commeting.

-- Julio H. Morimoto
-- address@hidden

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:45 PM, JHM <address@hidden> wrote:

to the list, sorry

-- Julio H. Morimoto
-- address@hidden

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:

Did you mean to send that to the list rather than just me?

-- PMM

On 18 August 2014 22:03, JHM <address@hidden> wrote:
> Well, I'll humbly apologize for wasting everyone's time :(
>
> Our client connections are coming from Brazil and the server is hosted in
> Canada. Turns out, the ISP we are using had issues that were resolved last
> night. I haven't changed any qemu parameters for the last couple of days.
> Last night we had a brief internet outage at the ISP level. Once it was
> back, download speeds were back to normal.
>
> Thanks everyone for commeting.
>
> -- Julio H. Morimoto
> -- address@hidden
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 18 August 2014 15:32, Dale R. Worley <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > The "per each function call" metric is tricky, because you'd need to
>> > define what a "function call" is.
>>
>> In particular, on some guest CPU architectures it's genuinely
>> not possible to reliably distinguish function call return from a
>> computed branch.
>>
>> -- PMM