[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-discuss] Disk Performance
From: |
Dale R. Worley |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-discuss] Disk Performance |
Date: |
Thu, 29 May 2014 10:38:28 -0400 |
> From: Quentin Hartman <address@hidden>
> When running on a ceph-backed volume, I get closer to 15MB/s using the same
> tests, and have as much as 50% iowait. Typical operations that take seconds
> on bare metal take tens of seconds, or minutes in a VM. This problem
> actually drove me to look at things with strace, and I'm finding streams of
> FSYNC and PSELECT6 timeouts while the processes are running. More direct
> tests of ceph performance are able to saturate the nic, pushing about
> 90MB/s. I have ganglia installed on the host machines, and when I am
> running tests from within a vm ,the network throughput seems to be getting
> artificially capped. Rather than the more "spiky" graph produced by the
> direct ceph tests, I get a perfectly flat horizontal line at 10 or 20MB/s.
Is there some sort of virtio for networking? It sounds like the
guest's driver thinks you've got a low-speed networking card. I don't
see any options in the qemu command to control your networking
configuration.
Dale
- [Qemu-discuss] Disk Performance, Quentin Hartman, 2014/05/28
- Re: [Qemu-discuss] Disk Performance,
Dale R. Worley <=
- Message not available
- Re: [Qemu-discuss] Disk Performance, Quentin Hartman, 2014/05/29
- Re: [Qemu-discuss] Disk Performance, Quentin Hartman, 2014/05/29
- Re: [Qemu-discuss] Disk Performance, Quentin Hartman, 2014/05/29
- Re: [Qemu-discuss] Disk Performance, Quentin Hartman, 2014/05/29
- Re: [Qemu-discuss] Disk Performance, Blair Bethwaite, 2014/05/29
- Re: [Qemu-discuss] Disk Performance, Stephan von Krawczynski, 2014/05/30
- Re: [Qemu-discuss] Disk Performance, Quentin Hartman, 2014/05/30
- Re: [Qemu-discuss] Disk Performance, Dale R. Worley, 2014/05/30
- Re: [Qemu-discuss] Disk Performance, Stephan von Krawczynski, 2014/05/30