qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] overcommit: introduce mem-lock-onfault


From: Daniil Tatianin
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] overcommit: introduce mem-lock-onfault
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 11:23:41 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird


On 1/23/25 7:31 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 04:19:40PM +0300, Daniil Tatianin wrote:
Currently, passing mem-lock=on to QEMU causes memory usage to grow by
huge amounts:

no memlock:
     $ ./qemu-system-x86_64 -overcommit mem-lock=off
     $ ps -p $(pidof ./qemu-system-x86_64) -o rss=
     45652

     $ ./qemu-system-x86_64 -overcommit mem-lock=off -enable-kvm
     $ ps -p $(pidof ./qemu-system-x86_64) -o rss=
     39756

memlock:
     $ ./qemu-system-x86_64 -overcommit mem-lock=on
     $ ps -p $(pidof ./qemu-system-x86_64) -o rss=
     1309876

     $ ./qemu-system-x86_64 -overcommit mem-lock=on -enable-kvm
     $ ps -p $(pidof ./qemu-system-x86_64) -o rss=
     259956

This is caused by the fact that mlockall(2) automatically
write-faults every existing and future anonymous mappings in the
process right away.

One of the reasons to enable mem-lock is to protect a QEMU process'
pages from being compacted and migrated by kcompactd (which does so
by messing with a live process page tables causing thousands of TLB
flush IPIs per second) basically stealing all guest time while it's
active.

mem-lock=on helps against this (given compact_unevictable_allowed is 0),
but the memory overhead it introduces is an undesirable side effect,
which we can completely avoid by passing MCL_ONFAULT to mlockall, which
is what this series allows to do with a new option for mem-lock called
on-fault.

memlock-onfault:
     $ ./qemu-system-x86_64 -overcommit mem-lock=on-fault
     $ ps -p $(pidof ./qemu-system-x86_64) -o rss=
     54004

     $ ./qemu-system-x86_64 -overcommit mem-lock=on-fault -enable-kvm
     $ ps -p $(pidof ./qemu-system-x86_64) -o rss=
     47772

You may notice the memory usage is still slightly higher, in this case
by a few megabytes over the mem-lock=off case. I was able to trace this
down to a bug in the linux kernel with MCL_ONFAULT not being honored for
the early process heap (with brk(2) etc.) so it is still write-faulted in
this case, but it's still way less than it was with just the mem-lock=on.

Changes since v1:
     - Don't make a separate mem-lock-onfault, add an on-fault option to 
mem-lock instead

Changes since v2:
     - Move overcommit option parsing out of line
     - Make enable_mlock an enum instead

Changes since v3:
     - Rebase to latest master due to the recent sysemu -> system renames

Daniil Tatianin (4):
   os: add an ability to lock memory on_fault
   system/vl: extract overcommit option parsing into a helper
   system: introduce a new MlockState enum
   overcommit: introduce mem-lock=on-fault

  hw/virtio/virtio-mem.c    |  2 +-
  include/system/os-posix.h |  2 +-
  include/system/os-win32.h |  3 ++-
  include/system/system.h   | 12 ++++++++-
  migration/postcopy-ram.c  |  4 +--
  os-posix.c                | 10 ++++++--
  qemu-options.hx           | 14 +++++++----
  system/globals.c          | 12 ++++++++-
  system/vl.c               | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
  9 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
Considering it's very mem relevant change and looks pretty benign.. I can
pick this if nobody disagrees (or beats me to it, which I'd appreciate).

I'll also provide at least one week for people to stop me.

I think it's been almost two weeks, so should be good now :)

Thanks!

Thanks,




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]