qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] plugins: add tb convenience functions


From: Pierrick Bouvier
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] plugins: add tb convenience functions
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 11:53:37 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

Hi Luke,

On 1/31/25 09:57, Luke Craig wrote:
This PR extends the plugin API with two functions which allow convenient access 
around tbs.

The first, qemu_plugin_tb_size, provides a mechanism for determining the total 
size of a translation block.

The second, qemu_plugin_tb_get_insn_by_vaddr, allows users to get a reference 
to an instruction by its virtual address rather than just its index.

In response to feedback from Pierrick I have updated the implementation of 
qemu_plugin_tb_size.

Additionally, I have added these functions to the insn.c test plugin in 
response to Alex's feedback.

Lastly, I'll provide a reply to Alex's feeback (repeated below):

But the general comment is this is an example of tying the plugin API
too deeply with the internals of the translator. Why does a plugin need
to know what is an implementation detail?

Finding the line between implementation detail and relevant to plugins is 
challenging, but I submitted this change because I found myself implementing 
these functions in plugins. If you'd like for me to enumerate examples where 
knowing the tb_size is relevant to analysis I'd be happy to submit some.

Luke Craig (3):
   plugin: extend API with qemu_plugin_tb_get_insn_by_vaddr
   plugin: extend API with qemu_plugin_tb_size
   plugins: extend insn test for new convenience functions


For all the series,
Reviewed-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>

  include/qemu/qemu-plugin.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
  plugins/api.c              | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
  tests/tcg/plugins/insn.c   | 10 ++++++++++
  3 files changed, 51 insertions(+)


To accept this series, commits should be signed off [1].
https://www.qemu.org/docs/master/devel/submitting-a-patch.html#patch-emails-must-include-a-signed-off-by-line

Thanks,
Pierrick



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]