Re: [PATCH 1/9] block: Allow inactivating already inactive nodes

[Eric Blake]

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 12:50:38PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> What we wanted to catch with the assertion is cases where the recursion
> finds that a child was inactive before its parent. This should never
> happen. But if the user tries to inactivate an image that is already
> inactive, that's harmless and we don't want to fail the assertion.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> ---
>  block.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libguestfs.org