qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] tcg: drop qemu_cpu_is_self() in tlb_flush_by_mmuidx[_async_w


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcg: drop qemu_cpu_is_self() in tlb_flush_by_mmuidx[_async_work]
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 14:36:42 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

(also Cc'ing Harsh for commit 18530e7c57de)

On 27/1/25 14:33, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 14:24:56 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote:

+Peter

On 23/1/25 14:38, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 12:09:59 +0000
Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> writes:
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 10:52:15 +0000
Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> writes:
QEMU will crash with following debug enabled
    # define DEBUG_TLB_GATE 1
    # define DEBUG_TLB_LOG_GATE 1
due to [1] introduced assert and as it happenstlb_flush_by_mmuidx[_async_work]
functions are called not only from vcpu thread but also from reset handler
that is called from main thread at cpu realize time when vcpu is already
created
    x86_cpu_new -> ... ->
        x86_cpu_realizefn -> cpu_reset -> ... ->
            tcg_cpu_reset_hold

drop assert to fix crash.

Hmm the assert is there for a good reason because we do not want to be
flushing another CPUs state. However the assert itself:

    g_assert(!(cpu)->created || qemu_cpu_is_self(cpu));

was trying to account for pre-initialised vCPUs. What has changed?

cpu_thread_signal_created(cpu) is called just before we start running
the main loop in mttcg_cpu_thread_fn. So any other thread messing with
the CPUs TLB can potentially mess things up.

it reproduces on current master, so yes it likely has changed over time.
I've just stumbled on it when attempting to get rid of cpu->created
usage.

Why the drive to get rid of cpu->created?

During review of Philippe's cpu cleanups,
I've noticed that  cpu->created is mostly used for signaling
main loop thread we've started vcpu thread with a couple of
odd cases in tcg and kvm.
    - 1st silently bit-rotted being behind ifdefs
    - 2nd is work around CPU being prematurely visible to others

2nd is:

commit 56adee407fc564da19e49cfe18e20e3da92320be
Author: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Feb 17 00:18:32 2023 +0800

      kvm: dirty-ring: Fix race with vcpu creation

      It's possible that we want to reap a dirty ring on a vcpu that is
during
      creation, because the vcpu is put onto list (CPU_FOREACH visible)
before
      initialization of the structures.  In this case:

      qemu_init_vcpu
          x86_cpu_realizefn
              cpu_exec_realizefn
                  cpu_list_add      <---- can be probed by CPU_FOREACH
              qemu_init_vcpu
                  cpus_accel->create_vcpu_thread(cpu);
                      kvm_init_vcpu
                          map kvm_dirty_gfns  <--- kvm_dirty_gfns valid

      Don't try to reap dirty ring on vcpus during creation or it'll crash.

Looking at cpu_list_add() in cpu_exec_realizefn():

hw/core/cpu-common.c-190-    /* Wait until cpu initialization complete
before exposing cpu. */
hw/core/cpu-common.c:191:    cpu_list_add(cpu);

IMO the problem is with cpu_list_add(), we shouldn't expose the vCPU
until it is realized.

that was my reasoning as well


cpu_list_add() seems to be doing 2 things, auto-assign CPU index if
UNASSIGNED_CPU_INDEX, then insert to global cpus_queue.

IIRC cpu_list_add() is called early because various cpu init code
expects cpu->index to be assigned.

Maybe we could extract the 'safely assign an unique cpu index' part
(guarding by qemu_cpu_list_lock), having cpu_list_add() just add to
the global queue. I'll give it a try...

ok,
lets see if we can postpone cpu_list_add() till the end of realize time.


I guess we could assert:

    g_assert(!current_cpu || qemu_cpu_is_self(cpu);

as current_cpu should only be set as we go into the main thread. However
there is a sketchy setting of current_cpu in cpu_exec() that I'm not
sure should be there. Also do_run_on_cpu() messes with current_cpu in a
way I don't fully understand either.

I'd rather not rely on that, even if it works it would be subject to
to the same kind of breakage.

How about instead of workaround check we would have 2 variants
of tlb_flush_by_mmuidx[_async_work], one that have self check
and other for usage externally (i.e. from reset handler).
That won't have to rely on sketchy globals (which becomes more
sketchy in context of Philippes's multi accel work),
and it would clearly document what can be used externally.

1)
Fixes: f0aff0f124028 ("cputlb: add assert_cpu_is_self checks")
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
---
   accel/tcg/cputlb.c | 4 ----
   1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/accel/tcg/cputlb.c b/accel/tcg/cputlb.c
index b26c0e088f..2da803103c 100644
--- a/accel/tcg/cputlb.c
+++ b/accel/tcg/cputlb.c
@@ -381,8 +381,6 @@ static void tlb_flush_by_mmuidx_async_work(CPUState *cpu, 
run_on_cpu_data data)
       uint16_t all_dirty, work, to_clean;
       int64_t now = get_clock_realtime();
- assert_cpu_is_self(cpu);
-
       tlb_debug("mmu_idx:0x%04" PRIx16 "\n", asked);
qemu_spin_lock(&cpu->neg.tlb.c.lock);
@@ -419,8 +417,6 @@ void tlb_flush_by_mmuidx(CPUState *cpu, uint16_t idxmap)
   {
       tlb_debug("mmu_idx: 0x%" PRIx16 "\n", idxmap);
- assert_cpu_is_self(cpu);
-
       tlb_flush_by_mmuidx_async_work(cpu, RUN_ON_CPU_HOST_INT(idxmap));
   }







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]