[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs/cpu-features: Update "PAuth" (Pointer Authenticatio
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs/cpu-features: Update "PAuth" (Pointer Authentication) details |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jan 2025 13:06:44 +0000 |
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 at 09:06, Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 10:04:37AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 19:11:06 +0000,
> > Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > +PAuth (Pointer Authentication) is a security feature in software that
> > > +was introduced in Armv8.3-A and Armv9.0-A. It aims to protect against
> >
> > nit: given that ARMv9.0 is congruent to ARMv8.5 and therefore has all
> > the ARMv8.5 features, mentioning ARMv8.3 should be enough (but I don't
> > feel strongly about this). I feel much strongly about the use of
> > capital letters, but I live in a distant past... ;-)
>
> Sure, I can keep it to just v8.3.
>
> On capitalization, I don't feel strongly about it, I just followed this
> commit[1], which explained that the rebranding changed "ARM" to "Arm":
>
> 6fe6d6c9a95 (docs: Be consistent about capitalization of 'Arm',
> 2020-03-09)
>
> That's why I went with it. I see you know this by your "distant past"
> remark :) To match the above, I'll keep the capitalization to "Arm".
We should probably do another fix-capitalization pass on docs/,
because a bunch more "ARM" uses have crept in since 6fe6d6c9a95.
(6fe6d6c9a95's commit message says that architecture names like
"ARMv8" retain all-caps, but I think that was my personal taste
creeping in -- at any rate the current Arm ARM uses "Armv8",
"Armv9", etc. It was right that "ARM926" etc should stay all-caps,
though.)
thanks
-- PMM