[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC 04/13] rust: add bindings for gpio_{in|out} initialization
From: |
Zhao Liu |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC 04/13] rust: add bindings for gpio_{in|out} initialization |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jan 2025 19:14:37 +0800 |
> > unsafe {
> > qdev_init_gpio_in(
> > self.upcast::<DeviceState>() as *const DeviceState as *mut
> > DeviceState,
>
> I think you can use self.as_mut_ptr::<DeviceState>() or something like that.
Yes, thank you!
>
> > assert!(pins.len() > 0);
>
> !pins.is_empty().
Yes.
> But I am not sure it's needed...
> >
> > unsafe {
> > qdev_init_gpio_out(
> > self.upcast::<DeviceState>() as *const DeviceState as *mut
> > DeviceState,
> > pins[0].as_ptr(),
> > pins.len() as c_int,
>
> ... if you use instead pins.as_ptr() without the initial dereference.
Emm, pins.as_ptr() returns `*const InterruptSource`, which can't be
converted to `*mut *mut IRQState` with InterruptSource::as_ptr().
So I haven't thought of a better way yet...
> > impl HPETState {
> > ...
> >
> > fn handle_legacy_irq(&self, irq: u32, level: u32) {
> > if irq == HPET_LEGACY_PIT_INT {
> > if !self.is_legacy_mode() {
> > self.irqs[0].set(level != 0);
> > }
> > } else {
> > self.rtc_irq_level.set(level as u8);
>
> Any reason why you defined rtc_irq_level as InterruptSource<u8>
> instead of InterruptSource<u32>?
Thanks! I missed to clean up this, having previously used u8.
Regards,
Zhao