qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC v3 2/5] vhost-iova-tree: Remove range check for IOVA allocator


From: Eugenio Perez Martin
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 2/5] vhost-iova-tree: Remove range check for IOVA allocator
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:02:21 +0100

On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 6:09 PM Jonah Palmer <jonah.palmer@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Removes the range check portion in vhost_iova_tree_map_alloc.
>
> The previous patch decoupled the IOVA allocator from adding mappings to
> the IOVA->HVA tree (now a partial SVQ IOVA->HVA tree) and instead adds
> the allocated IOVA range to an IOVA-only tree. No value exists under
> translated_addr for the IOVA-only mappings, so this check is no longer
> needed.
>
> This check was moved to vhost_iova_tree_insert in the previous patch
> since that function handles adding IOVA->HVA mappings to the SVQ
> IOVA->HVA tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonah Palmer <jonah.palmer@oracle.com>
> ---
>  hw/virtio/vhost-iova-tree.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-iova-tree.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-iova-tree.c
> index b1cfd17843..f6a5694857 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-iova-tree.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-iova-tree.c
> @@ -93,8 +93,7 @@ int vhost_iova_tree_map_alloc(VhostIOVATree *tree, DMAMap 
> *map)
>      /* Some vhost devices do not like addr 0. Skip first page */
>      hwaddr iova_first = tree->iova_first ?: qemu_real_host_page_size();
>

This is not a static function, so I guess it is better to duplicate
the check if needed? Otherwise a buggy caller can create invalid
entries.

> -    if (map->translated_addr + map->size < map->translated_addr ||
> -        map->perm == IOMMU_NONE) {
> +    if (map->perm == IOMMU_NONE) {
>          return IOVA_ERR_INVALID;
>      }
>
> --
> 2.43.5
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]