Re: [PATCH v4 17/32] system/qtest: properly feedback results of clock_[step|set]

[Michael Tokarev]

13.01.2025 19:26, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> writes:
>
> > Ghrm. 46 recipients seems to be quite a bit too aggressive..
>
> I think git-publish just accumulates Cc's from each run for a given
> branch. While I can reset the version counter I'm not sure where I can
> reset the Cc list from.

I never used git-publish.  It's fun to know which other tools do people
use :)

> > 08.01.2025 15:10, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > > Time will not advance if the system is paused or there are no timer
> > > events set for the future. In absence of pending timer events
> > > advancing time would make no difference the system state. Attempting
> > > to do so would be a bug and the test or device under test would need
> > > fixing.
> > > Tighten up the result reporting to `FAIL` if time was not advanced.
> >
> > Is this qemu-stable material?
>
> Probably not - I guess that was a Cc from a previous series that stuck?

No, it's just that it fixes an issue reported on gitlab (!2687),
which apparently weren't fixed in time for 9.2, - that's why :)

Thanks,

/mjt