Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm: Add collie and sx functional tests

[Jan Lübbe]

On Sun, 2024-10-27 at 20:32 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/27/24 15:26, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > On 10/27/24 23:11, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 10/27/24 14:13, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > > > On 10/26/24 17:32, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > > On 10/26/24 03:02, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> > > > > [ ... ]
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > Works for me, though, and it is much better than mandating the 
> > > > > existence
> > > > > of boot partitions.
> > > > 
> > > > Yes. However, if the emmc device was user creatable, we could use :
> > > > 
> > > >    -blockdev 
> > > > node-name=emmc0,driver=file,filename=mmc-ast2600-evb-noboot.raw \
> > > >    -device emmc,bus=sdhci-bus.2,drive=emmc0
> > > > 
> > > > and with boot partitions:
> > > > 
> > > >    -M boot-emmc=true \
> > > >    -blockdev node-name=emmc0,driver=file,filename=mmc-ast2600-evb.raw \
> > > >    -device 
> > > > emmc,bus=sdhci-bus.2,drive=emmc0,boot-partition-size=1048576,boot-config=8
> > > > 
> > > > The above would be my preferred approach if acceptable. The "sd-bus"
> > > > bus identifier should be changed in other machines tough.
> > > 
> > > No real preference here, though my understanding is that emmc devices
> > > are by definition built-in, and that is what emmc_class_init() says as 
> > > well.
> > > Also, there does not seem to be an sdhci-bus, only sd-bus, and that does
> > > not support any index values. That may be just my lack of knowledge, 
> > > though.
> > 
> > No, you are right. On a real ast2600-evb, the eMMC device is indeed
> > soldered on the board. But, for testing purposes, it is sometime
> > interesting to add some flexibility in the machine definition and
> > in the modeling too. This avoids "hard-coding" default devices in
> > the machines and lets the user define its own variant models using
> > the QEMU command line.
> 
> I would agree, but I had a number of my patches rejected because while
> they would be useful for testing they would not accurately reflect the
> hardware. So nowadays I gave up even trying to upstream such changes.

My patch to make eMMCs user creatable [1] was applied to target-
arm.next by Peter Maydell [2] last week.

Jan

[1] 
20241015135649.4189256-1-jlu@pengutronix.de/">https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20241015135649.4189256-1-jlu@pengutronix.de/
[2] 
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/CAFEAcA9sjszCj=Fu-A-=qQV_jawnomJ-Nqnd=Vx2vLKmYZ1-nQ@mail.gmail.com/

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                        |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                    | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany               | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686        | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |