[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/xilinx_zynq: Enable Security Extensions
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/xilinx_zynq: Enable Security Extensions |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Aug 2024 13:50:02 +0100 |
On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 at 01:51, Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
> The system supports the Security Extensions (core and GIC). This change is
> necessary to run tests which pass on the real hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de>
(Added the maintainers to cc.)
Does the system have any secure-only devices, RAM, etc?
How much testing have you done with this change? (The main
reason we disabled has-el3 on this board back in 2014 was
as a backwards-compatibility thing when we added EL3 support
to the CPU model -- we didn't have a ton of images for the
board so we erred on the safe side of not changing the
behaviour to avoid potentially breaking existing guest code.)
> ---
> hw/arm/xilinx_zynq.c | 8 --------
> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/xilinx_zynq.c b/hw/arm/xilinx_zynq.c
> index 3c56b9abe1..37c234f5ab 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/xilinx_zynq.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/xilinx_zynq.c
> @@ -219,14 +219,6 @@ static void zynq_init(MachineState *machine)
> for (n = 0; n < smp_cpus; n++) {
> Object *cpuobj = object_new(machine->cpu_type);
>
> - /*
> - * By default A9 CPUs have EL3 enabled. This board does not
> currently
> - * support EL3 so the CPU EL3 property is disabled before
> realization.
> - */
> - if (object_property_find(cpuobj, "has_el3")) {
> - object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, "has_el3", false, &error_fatal);
> - }
> -
> object_property_set_int(cpuobj, "midr", ZYNQ_BOARD_MIDR,
> &error_fatal);
> object_property_set_int(cpuobj, "reset-cbar", MPCORE_PERIPHBASE,
thanks
-- PMM