[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [PATCH v2 04/17] intel_iommu: Flush stage-2 cache in PASID-selective
From: |
Duan, Zhenzhong |
Subject: |
RE: [PATCH v2 04/17] intel_iommu: Flush stage-2 cache in PASID-selective PASID-based iotlb invalidation |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Aug 2024 05:48:55 +0000 |
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/17] intel_iommu: Flush stage-2 cache in PASID-
>selective PASID-based iotlb invalidation
>
>On 2024/8/5 14:27, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>> Per spec 6.5.2.4, PADID-selective PASID-based iotlb invalidation will
>> flush stage-2 iotlb entries with matching domain id and pasid.
>>
>> With scalable modern mode introduced, guest could send PASID-selective
>> PASID-based iotlb invalidation to flush both stage-1 and stage-2 entries.
>
>I'm not quite sure if this is correct. In the last collumn of the table 21
>in 6.5.2.4, the paging structures of SS will not be invalidated. So it's
>not quite recommended for software to invalidate the iotlb entries with
>PGTT==SS-only by P_IOTLB invalidation, it's more recommended to use the
>IOTLB invalidation.
Hmm, when pasid is used with SS-only, PASID-based iotlb invalidation can give
better granularity, (DID,PASID) vs. (DID) for IOTLB invalidation.
If non-leaf SS-paging entry is updated, IOTLB invalidation should be used as
SS-paging structure cache isn't flushed with PASID-selective PASID-based iotlb
invalidation.
Thanks
Zhenzhong
>
>> By this chance, remove old IOTLB related definition.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
>> ---
>> hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h | 14 +++---
>> hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 81
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
>b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
>> index 8fa27c7f3b..19e4ed52ca 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
>> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
>> @@ -402,11 +402,6 @@ typedef union VTDInvDesc VTDInvDesc;
>> #define VTD_INV_DESC_IOTLB_AM(val) ((val) & 0x3fULL)
>> #define VTD_INV_DESC_IOTLB_RSVD_LO 0xffffffff0000ff00ULL
>> #define VTD_INV_DESC_IOTLB_RSVD_HI 0xf80ULL
>> -#define VTD_INV_DESC_IOTLB_PASID_PASID (2ULL << 4)
>> -#define VTD_INV_DESC_IOTLB_PASID_PAGE (3ULL << 4)
>> -#define VTD_INV_DESC_IOTLB_PASID(val) (((val) >> 32) &
>VTD_PASID_ID_MASK)
>> -#define VTD_INV_DESC_IOTLB_PASID_RSVD_LO
>0xfff00000000001c0ULL
>> -#define VTD_INV_DESC_IOTLB_PASID_RSVD_HI 0xf80ULL
>>
>> /* Mask for Device IOTLB Invalidate Descriptor */
>> #define VTD_INV_DESC_DEVICE_IOTLB_ADDR(val) ((val) &
>0xfffffffffffff000ULL)
>> @@ -438,6 +433,15 @@ typedef union VTDInvDesc VTDInvDesc;
>> (0x3ffff800ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM |
>VTD_SL_TM)) : \
>> (0x3ffff800ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM))
>>
>> +/* Masks for PIOTLB Invalidate Descriptor */
>> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_G (3ULL << 4)
>> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_ALL_IN_PASID (2ULL << 4)
>> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_PSI_IN_PASID (3ULL << 4)
>> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_DID(val) (((val) >> 16) &
>VTD_DOMAIN_ID_MASK)
>> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_PASID(val) (((val) >> 32) & 0xfffffULL)
>> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_RSVD_VAL0 0xfff000000000f1c0ULL
>> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_RSVD_VAL1 0xf80ULL
>> +
>> /* Information about page-selective IOTLB invalidate */
>> struct VTDIOTLBPageInvInfo {
>> uint16_t domain_id;
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>> index c1382a5651..df591419b7 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>> @@ -2656,6 +2656,83 @@ static bool
>vtd_process_iotlb_desc(IntelIOMMUState *s, VTDInvDesc *inv_desc)
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> +static gboolean vtd_hash_remove_by_pasid(gpointer key, gpointer value,
>> + gpointer user_data)
>> +{
>> + VTDIOTLBEntry *entry = (VTDIOTLBEntry *)value;
>> + VTDIOTLBPageInvInfo *info = (VTDIOTLBPageInvInfo *)user_data;
>> +
>> + return ((entry->domain_id == info->domain_id) &&
>> + (entry->pasid == info->pasid));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void vtd_piotlb_pasid_invalidate(IntelIOMMUState *s,
>> + uint16_t domain_id, uint32_t pasid)
>> +{
>> + VTDIOTLBPageInvInfo info;
>> + VTDAddressSpace *vtd_as;
>> + VTDContextEntry ce;
>> +
>> + info.domain_id = domain_id;
>> + info.pasid = pasid;
>> +
>> + vtd_iommu_lock(s);
>> + g_hash_table_foreach_remove(s->iotlb, vtd_hash_remove_by_pasid,
>> + &info);
>> + vtd_iommu_unlock(s);
>> +
>> + QLIST_FOREACH(vtd_as, &s->vtd_as_with_notifiers, next) {
>> + if (!vtd_dev_to_context_entry(s, pci_bus_num(vtd_as->bus),
>> + vtd_as->devfn, &ce) &&
>> + domain_id == vtd_get_domain_id(s, &ce, vtd_as->pasid)) {
>> + uint32_t rid2pasid = VTD_CE_GET_RID2PASID(&ce);
>> +
>> + if ((vtd_as->pasid != PCI_NO_PASID || pasid != rid2pasid) &&
>> + vtd_as->pasid != pasid) {
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!s->scalable_modern) {
>> + vtd_address_space_sync(vtd_as);
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool vtd_process_piotlb_desc(IntelIOMMUState *s,
>> + VTDInvDesc *inv_desc)
>> +{
>> + uint16_t domain_id;
>> + uint32_t pasid;
>> +
>> + if ((inv_desc->val[0] & VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_RSVD_VAL0) ||
>> + (inv_desc->val[1] & VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_RSVD_VAL1)) {
>> + error_report_once("%s: invalid piotlb inv desc hi=0x%"PRIx64
>> + " lo=0x%"PRIx64" (reserved bits unzero)",
>> + __func__, inv_desc->val[1], inv_desc->val[0]);
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + domain_id = VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_DID(inv_desc->val[0]);
>> + pasid = VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_PASID(inv_desc->val[0]);
>> + switch (inv_desc->val[0] & VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_G) {
>> + case VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_ALL_IN_PASID:
>> + vtd_piotlb_pasid_invalidate(s, domain_id, pasid);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_PSI_IN_PASID:
>> + break;
>> +
>> + default:
>> + error_report_once("%s: invalid piotlb inv desc: hi=0x%"PRIx64
>> + ", lo=0x%"PRIx64" (type mismatch: 0x%llx)",
>> + __func__, inv_desc->val[1], inv_desc->val[0],
>> + inv_desc->val[0] & VTD_INV_DESC_IOTLB_G);
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> static bool vtd_process_inv_iec_desc(IntelIOMMUState *s,
>> VTDInvDesc *inv_desc)
>> {
>> @@ -2775,6 +2852,10 @@ static bool
>vtd_process_inv_desc(IntelIOMMUState *s)
>> break;
>>
>> case VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB:
>> + trace_vtd_inv_desc("p-iotlb", inv_desc.val[1], inv_desc.val[0]);
>> + if (!vtd_process_piotlb_desc(s, &inv_desc)) {
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> break;
>>
>> case VTD_INV_DESC_WAIT:
>
>--
>Regards,
>Yi Liu
- [PATCH v2 02/17] intel_iommu: Make pasid entry type check accurate, (continued)
- [PATCH v2 02/17] intel_iommu: Make pasid entry type check accurate, Zhenzhong Duan, 2024/08/05
- [PATCH v2 04/17] intel_iommu: Flush stage-2 cache in PASID-selective PASID-based iotlb invalidation, Zhenzhong Duan, 2024/08/05
- Re: [PATCH v2 04/17] intel_iommu: Flush stage-2 cache in PASID-selective PASID-based iotlb invalidation, CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF, 2024/08/06
- Re: [PATCH v2 04/17] intel_iommu: Flush stage-2 cache in PASID-selective PASID-based iotlb invalidation, Duan, Zhenzhong, 2024/08/08
- Re: [PATCH v2 04/17] intel_iommu: Flush stage-2 cache in PASID-selective PASID-based iotlb invalidation, CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF, 2024/08/08
- RE: [PATCH v2 04/17] intel_iommu: Flush stage-2 cache in PASID-selective PASID-based iotlb invalidation, Duan, Zhenzhong, 2024/08/12
- Re: [PATCH v2 04/17] intel_iommu: Flush stage-2 cache in PASID-selective PASID-based iotlb invalidation, CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF, 2024/08/13
- Re: [PATCH v2 04/17] intel_iommu: Flush stage-2 cache in PASID-selective PASID-based iotlb invalidation, CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF, 2024/08/13
Re: [PATCH v2 04/17] intel_iommu: Flush stage-2 cache in PASID-selective PASID-based iotlb invalidation, Yi Liu, 2024/08/14
[PATCH v2 05/17] intel_iommu: Rename slpte to pte, Zhenzhong Duan, 2024/08/05
[PATCH v2 06/17] intel_iommu: Implement stage-1 translation, Zhenzhong Duan, 2024/08/05
[PATCH v2 07/17] intel_iommu: Check if the input address is canonical, Zhenzhong Duan, 2024/08/05
[PATCH v2 08/17] intel_iommu: Set accessed and dirty bits during first stage translation, Zhenzhong Duan, 2024/08/05