[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] acpi/ghes: add support for generic error injection vi
From: |
Mauro Carvalho Chehab |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] acpi/ghes: add support for generic error injection via QAPI |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Aug 2024 14:11:14 +0200 |
Em Tue, 6 Aug 2024 16:31:13 +0200
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> escreveu:
> > + /* Could also be read back from the error_block_address register */
> > + *error_block_addr = base +
> > + ACPI_GHES_ERROR_SOURCE_COUNT * sizeof(uint64_t) +
> > + ACPI_GHES_ERROR_SOURCE_COUNT * sizeof(uint64_t) +
> > + error_source_to_index[notify] * ACPI_GHES_MAX_RAW_DATA_LENGTH;
> > +
> > + return true;
> > +}
>
> I don't like all this pointer math, which is basically a reverse engineered
> QEMU actions on startup + guest provided etc/hardware_errors address.
>
> For once, it assumes error_source_to_index[] matches order in which HEST
> error sources were described, which is fragile.
>
> 2nd: migration-wive it's disaster, since old/new HEST/hardware_errors tables
> in RAM migrated from older version might not match above assumptions
> of target QEMU.
>
> I see 2 ways to rectify it:
> 1st: preferred/cleanest would be to tell QEMU (via fw_cfg) address of HEST
> table
> in guest RAM, like we do with etc/hardware_errors, see
> build_ghes_error_table()
> ...
> tell firmware to write hardware_errors GPA into
> and then fetch from HEST table in RAM, the guest patched error/ack
> addresses
> for given source_id
>
> code-wise: relatively simple once one wraps their own head over
> how this whole APEI thing works in QEMU
> workflow is described in docs/specs/acpi_hest_ghes.rst
> look to me as sufficient to grasp it.
> (but my view is very biased given my prior knowledge,
> aka: docs/comments/examples wrt acpi patching are good
> enough)
> (if it's not clear how to do it, ask me for pointers)
That sounds a better approach, however...
> 2nd: sort of hack based on build_ghes_v2() Error Status Address/Read Ack
> Register
> patching instructions
> bios_linker_loader_add_pointer(linker, ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE,
>
> address_offset + GAS_ADDR_OFFSET, sizeof(uint64_t),
>
> ACPI_GHES_ERRORS_FW_CFG_FILE, source_id *
> sizeof(uint64_t));
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> during build_ghes_v2() also store on a side mapping
> source_id -> error address offset : read ack address
>
> so when you are injecting error, you'd at least use offsets
> used at start time, to get rid of risk where injection code
> diverge from HEST:etc/hardware_errors layout at start time.
>
> However to make migration safe, one would need to add a fat
> comment not to change order ghest error sources in HEST _and_
> a dedicated unit test to make sure we catch it when that happens.
> bios_tables_test should be able to catch the change, but it won't
> say what's wrong, hence a test case that explicitly checks order
> and loudly & clear complains when we will break order assumptions.
>
> downside:
> * we are are limiting ways HEST could be composed/reshuffled in
> future
> * consumption of extra CI resources
> * and well, it relies on above duct tape holding all pieces
> together
I ended opting to do approach (2) on this changeset, as the current code
is already using bios_linker_loader_add_pointer() for ghes, being deeply
relying on the block address/ack and cper calculus.
To avoid troubles on this duct tape, I opted to move all offset math
to a single function at ghes.c:
/*
* ID numbers used to fill HEST source ID field
*/
enum AcpiHestSourceId {
ACPI_HEST_SRC_ID_SEA,
ACPI_HEST_SRC_ID_GED,
/* Shall be the last one */
ACPI_HEST_SRC_ID_COUNT
} AcpiHestSourceId;
...
static bool acpi_hest_address_offset(enum AcpiGhesNotifyType notify,
uint64_t *error_block_offset,
uint64_t *ack_offset,
uint64_t *cper_offset,
enum AcpiHestSourceId *source_id)
{
enum AcpiHestSourceId source;
uint64_t offset;
switch (notify) {
case ACPI_GHES_NOTIFY_SEA: /* Only on ARMv8 */
source = ACPI_HEST_SRC_ID_SEA;
break;
case ACPI_GHES_NOTIFY_GPIO:
source = ACPI_HEST_SRC_ID_GED;
break;
default:
return true;
}
if (source_id) {
*source_id = source;
}
/*
* Please see docs/specs/acpi_hest_ghes.rst for the memory layout.
* In summary, memory starts with error addresses, then acks and
* finally CPER blocks.
*/
offset = source * sizeof(uint64_t);
if (error_block_offset) {
*error_block_offset = offset;
}
if (ack_offset) {
*ack_offset = offset + ACPI_HEST_SRC_ID_COUNT *
sizeof(uint64_t);
}
if (cper_offset) {
*cper_offset = 2 * ACPI_HEST_SRC_ID_COUNT * sizeof(uint64_t) +
source * ACPI_GHES_MAX_RAW_DATA_LENGTH;
}
return false;
}
I also removed the anonymous enum with SEA/GPIO source IDs, using
only the ACPI notify type as arguments at the function calls.
As there's now a single point where the offsets from
docs/specs/acpi_hest_ghes.rst are enforced, this should be error
prone.
The code could later be changed to use approach (2), on a separate
cleanup.
Thanks,
Mauro
- Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] acpi/ghes: add support for generic error injection via QAPI, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] acpi/ghes: add support for generic error injection via QAPI, Igor Mammedov, 2024/08/07
- Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] acpi/ghes: add support for generic error injection via QAPI, Jonathan Cameron, 2024/08/07
- Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] acpi/ghes: add support for generic error injection via QAPI, Igor Mammedov, 2024/08/08
- Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] acpi/ghes: add support for generic error injection via QAPI, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, 2024/08/08
- Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] acpi/ghes: add support for generic error injection via QAPI, Igor Mammedov, 2024/08/12
- Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] acpi/ghes: add support for generic error injection via QAPI, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, 2024/08/13
- Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] acpi/ghes: add support for generic error injection via QAPI,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <=
- Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] acpi/ghes: add support for generic error injection via QAPI, Igor Mammedov, 2024/08/08
[PATCH v5 3/7] arm/virt: Wire up GPIO error source for ACPI / GHES, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, 2024/08/02
[PATCH v5 1/7] arm/virt: place power button pin number on a define, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, 2024/08/02