qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4] blockcommit: Reopen base image as RO after abort


From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] blockcommit: Reopen base image as RO after abort
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 12:22:23 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 28.03.24 12:16, Alexander Ivanov wrote:
If a blockcommit is aborted the base image remains in RW mode, that leads
to a fail of subsequent live migration.

How to reproduce:
   $ virsh snapshot-create-as vm snp1 --disk-only

   *** write something to the disk inside the guest ***

   $ virsh blockcommit vm vda --active --shallow && virsh blockjob vm vda 
--abort
   $ lsof /vzt/vm.qcow2
   COMMAND      PID USER   FD   TYPE DEVICE   SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
   qemu-syst 433203 root   45u   REG  253,0 1724776448  133 /vzt/vm.qcow2
   $ cat /proc/433203/fdinfo/45
   pos:    0
   flags:  02140002 <==== The last 2 means RW mode

If the base image is in RW mode at the end of blockcommit and was in RO
mode before blockcommit, reopen the base BDS in RO.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Ivanov <alexander.ivanov@virtuozzo.com>
---
  block/mirror.c | 11 +++++++++--
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/mirror.c b/block/mirror.c
index 1bdce3b657..d23be57255 100644
--- a/block/mirror.c
+++ b/block/mirror.c
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ typedef struct MirrorBlockJob {
      int64_t active_write_bytes_in_flight;
      bool prepared;
      bool in_drain;
+    bool base_ro;
  } MirrorBlockJob;
typedef struct MirrorBDSOpaque {
@@ -797,6 +798,10 @@ static int mirror_exit_common(Job *job)
      bdrv_drained_end(target_bs);
      bdrv_unref(target_bs);
+ if (abort && s->base_ro && !bdrv_is_read_only(target_bs)) {
+        bdrv_reopen_set_read_only(target_bs, true, NULL);
+    }
+

All looks good to me except this: seems it is safer to place this "if" block before 
"bdrv_drained_end(); bdrv_unref();" above. With it moved:
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>

      bs_opaque->job = NULL;
bdrv_drained_end(src);
@@ -1717,6 +1722,7 @@ static BlockJob *mirror_start_job(
                               bool is_none_mode, BlockDriverState *base,
                               bool auto_complete, const char *filter_node_name,
                               bool is_mirror, MirrorCopyMode copy_mode,
+                             bool base_ro,
                               Error **errp)
  {
      MirrorBlockJob *s;
@@ -1800,6 +1806,7 @@ static BlockJob *mirror_start_job(
      bdrv_unref(mirror_top_bs);
s->mirror_top_bs = mirror_top_bs;
+    s->base_ro = base_ro;
/* No resize for the target either; while the mirror is still running, a
       * consistent read isn't necessarily possible. We could possibly allow
@@ -2029,7 +2036,7 @@ void mirror_start(const char *job_id, BlockDriverState 
*bs,
                       speed, granularity, buf_size, backing_mode, zero_target,
                       on_source_error, on_target_error, unmap, NULL, NULL,
                       &mirror_job_driver, is_none_mode, base, false,
-                     filter_node_name, true, copy_mode, errp);
+                     filter_node_name, true, copy_mode, false, errp);
  }
BlockJob *commit_active_start(const char *job_id, BlockDriverState *bs,
@@ -2058,7 +2065,7 @@ BlockJob *commit_active_start(const char *job_id, 
BlockDriverState *bs,
                       on_error, on_error, true, cb, opaque,
                       &commit_active_job_driver, false, base, auto_complete,
                       filter_node_name, false, MIRROR_COPY_MODE_BACKGROUND,
-                     errp);
+                     base_read_only, errp);
      if (!job) {
          goto error_restore_flags;
      }

--
Best regards,
Vladimir




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]