[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC QEMU PATCH v8 2/2] virtio-pci: implement No_Soft_Reset bit
From: |
Chen, Jiqian |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC QEMU PATCH v8 2/2] virtio-pci: implement No_Soft_Reset bit |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Mar 2024 07:00:02 +0000 |
On 2024/3/28 20:36, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> static void virtio_pci_bus_reset_hold(Object *obj)
>>>> {
>>>> PCIDevice *dev = PCI_DEVICE(obj);
>>>> DeviceState *qdev = DEVICE(obj);
>>>>
>>>> + if (virtio_pci_no_soft_reset(dev)) {
>>>> + return;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> virtio_pci_reset(qdev);
>>>>
>>>> if (pci_is_express(dev)) {
>>>> @@ -2484,6 +2511,8 @@ static Property virtio_pci_properties[] = {
>>>> VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_INIT_LNKCTL_BIT, true),
>>>> DEFINE_PROP_BIT("x-pcie-pm-init", VirtIOPCIProxy, flags,
>>>> VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_INIT_PM_BIT, true),
>>>> + DEFINE_PROP_BIT("x-pcie-pm-no-soft-reset", VirtIOPCIProxy, flags,
>>>> + VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_PM_NO_SOFT_RESET_BIT, false),
>>>> DEFINE_PROP_BIT("x-pcie-flr-init", VirtIOPCIProxy, flags,
>>>> VIRTIO_PCI_FLAG_INIT_FLR_BIT, true),
>>>> DEFINE_PROP_BIT("aer", VirtIOPCIProxy, flags,
>>>
>>> I am a bit confused about this part.
>>> Do you want to make this software controllable?
>> Yes, because even the real hardware, this bit is not always set.
>
> So which virtio devices should and which should not set this bit?
This depends on the scenario the virtio-device is used, if we want to trigger
an internal soft reset for the virtio-device during S3, this bit shouldn't be
set.
In my use case on my environment, I don't want to reset virtio-gpu during S3,
because once the display resources are destroyed, there are not enough
information to re-create them, so this bit should be set.
Making this bit software controllable is convenient for users to take their own
choices.
>
>>> Or should this be set to true by default and then
>>> changed to false for old machine types?
>> How can I do so?
>> Do you mean set this to true by default, and if old machine types don't need
>> this bit, they can pass false config to qemu when running qemu?
>
> No, you would use compat machinery. See how is x-pcie-flr-init handled.
>
>
--
Best regards,
Jiqian Chen.
- [RFC QEMU PATCH v8 0/1] S3 support, Jiqian Chen, 2024/03/28
- [RFC QEMU PATCH v8 1/2] virtio-pci: only reset pm state during resetting, Jiqian Chen, 2024/03/28
- [RFC QEMU PATCH v8 2/2] virtio-pci: implement No_Soft_Reset bit, Jiqian Chen, 2024/03/28
- Re: [RFC QEMU PATCH v8 2/2] virtio-pci: implement No_Soft_Reset bit, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2024/03/28
- Re: [RFC QEMU PATCH v8 2/2] virtio-pci: implement No_Soft_Reset bit, Chen, Jiqian, 2024/03/28
- Re: [RFC QEMU PATCH v8 2/2] virtio-pci: implement No_Soft_Reset bit, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2024/03/28
- Re: [RFC QEMU PATCH v8 2/2] virtio-pci: implement No_Soft_Reset bit,
Chen, Jiqian <=
- Re: [RFC QEMU PATCH v8 2/2] virtio-pci: implement No_Soft_Reset bit, Jason Wang, 2024/03/29
- Re: [RFC QEMU PATCH v8 2/2] virtio-pci: implement No_Soft_Reset bit, Chen, Jiqian, 2024/03/29
- Re: [RFC QEMU PATCH v8 2/2] virtio-pci: implement No_Soft_Reset bit, Jason Wang, 2024/03/29
- Re: [RFC QEMU PATCH v8 2/2] virtio-pci: implement No_Soft_Reset bit, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2024/03/29