[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC 0/2] disable the configuration interrupt for the unsupported de
From: |
Cindy Lu |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC 0/2] disable the configuration interrupt for the unsupported device |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Mar 2024 11:02:09 +0800 |
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 12:12 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 5:33 PM Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 5:12 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 4:28 PM Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 3:54 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 2:03 PM Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 11:05 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Cindy:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 9:29 AM Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > we need a crash in Non-standard image, here is the jira for
> > > > > > > > this https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-28522
> > > > > > > > The root cause of the issue is that an IRQFD was used without
> > > > > > > > initialization..
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > During the booting process of the Vyatta image, the behavior of
> > > > > > > > the called function in qemu is as follows:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 1. vhost_net_stop() was called, this will call the function
> > > > > > > > virtio_pci_set_guest_notifiers() with assgin= false, and
> > > > > > > > virtio_pci_set_guest_notifiers() will release the irqfd for
> > > > > > > > vector 0
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Before vhost_net_stop(), do we know which vector is used by which
> > > > > > > queue?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > before this stop, vdev->config_verctor is get from
> > > > > > virtio_pci_common_read/virtio_pci_common_write
> > > > > > it was set to vector 0
> > > > >
> > > > > I basically meant if vector 0 is shared with some virtqueues here.
> > > > >
> > > > Really sorry for this, vq's vector is 1,2, and will not share with the
> > > > configure vector
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2. virtio_reset() was called -->set configure vector to
> > > > > > > > VIRTIO_NO_VECTORt
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 3.vhost_net_start() was called (at this time the configure
> > > > > > > > vector is
> > > > > > > > still VIRTIO_NO_VECTOR) and call
> > > > > > > > virtio_pci_set_guest_notifiers() with
> > > > > > > > assgin= true, so the irqfd for vector 0 was not "init" during
> > > > > > > > this process
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How does the configure vector differ from the virtqueue vector
> > > > > > > here?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > All the vectors are VIRTIO_NO_VECTOR (including vq). any
> > > > > > msix_fire_vector_notifier()
> > > > > > been called will cause the crash at this time.
> > > > >
> > > > > Won't virtio_pci_set_guest_notifiers() will try to allocate irqfd when
> > > > > the assignment is true?
> > > > >
> > > > It will allocate, but the vector is VIRTIO_NO_VECTOR (0xffff)
> > > >
> > > > then it will called kvm_virtio_pci_vector_use_one()
> > > >
> > > > in this function, there is a check for
> > > >
> > > > if (vector >= msix_nr_vectors_allocated(dev))
> > > >
> > > > { return 0; }
> > > >
> > > > So it will return.
> > >
> > > How about let's just fix this?
> > >
> > > Btw, it's better to explain in detail like the above in the next version.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > The problem is I think the behavior here is correct, The vector here is
> > VIRTIO_NO_VECTOR and we should return,
>
> So if I understand correctly, the configure vector is configured after
> DRIVER_OK?
>
sorry I didn't get your point, Do you mean set_guest_notifiers()?,
this was called during the system boot
but for the value of vdev->config_vector/vq vector, this is changed
by virtio_pci_common_read/virtio_pci_common_write
and these function will not check the process DRIVER_OK.
> Spec doesn't forbid this, this is something we need to support.
>
> It looks to me the correct fix is to kvm_virtio_pci_vector_use_one()
> when guest is writing to msix_vector after DRIVER_OK?
>
if I understand correctly. do you mean
when function virtio_pci_common_read/virtio_pci_common_write was called
we need to check the number of vdev->config_vector/vq vector, if this
was changed and also DRIVER_OK was set
then we need to call virtio_pci_set_guest_notifiers() to re-init the irqfd?
Thanks
cindy
> Thanks
>
> > the fix could work maybe is we try get to know if this was changed
> > from another value
> > and use that one? this seems strange.
> > Thanks
> > cindy
> > > >
> > > > > > So I think this should
> > > > > > be a bug in this guest image
> > > > >
> > > > > The point is Qemu should not crash even if the guest driver is buggy.
> > > > >
> > > > > It would be nice if we can have a qtest for this on top.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > sure, got it, I have done the Qtest, and it passed
> > > > here is the result
> > > >
> > > > Ok: 794
> > > > Expected Fail: 0
> > > > Fail: 0
> > > > Unexpected Pass: 0
> > > > Skipped: 32
> > > > Timeout: 0
> > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 4. The system continues to boot and msix_fire_vector_notifier()
> > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > called unmask the vector 0 and then met the crash
> > > > > > > > [msix_fire_vector_notifier] 112 called vector 0 is_masked 1
> > > > > > > > [msix_fire_vector_notifier] 112 called vector 0 is_masked 0
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The reason for not reproducing in RHEL/fedora guest image is
> > > > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > REHL/Fedora doesn't have the behavior of calling vhost_net_stop
> > > > > > > > and then virtio_reset, and also won't call
> > > > > > > > msix_fire_vector_notifier for vector 0 during system boot.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The reason for not reproducing before configure interrupt
> > > > > > > > support is because
> > > > > > > > vector 0 is for configure interrupt, before the support for
> > > > > > > > configure interrupts, the notifier process will not handle
> > > > > > > > vector 0.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For the device Vyatta using, it doesn't support configure
> > > > > > > > interrupts at all, So we plan to disable the configure
> > > > > > > > interrupts in unsupported device
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Btw, let's tweak the changelog, it's a little bit hard to
> > > > > > > understand.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > sure will do
> > > > > > thanks
> > > > > > Cindy
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cindy Lu (2):
> > > > > > > > virtio-net: disable the configure interrupt for not support
> > > > > > > > device
> > > > > > > > virtio-pci: check if the configure interrupt enable
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > hw/net/virtio-net.c | 5 ++++-
> > > > > > > > hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c | 41
> > > > > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > > > > > > hw/virtio/virtio.c | 1 +
> > > > > > > > include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 1 +
> > > > > > > > 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > 2.43.0
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
- Re: [RFC 0/2] disable the configuration interrupt for the unsupported device, (continued)
- Re: [RFC 0/2] disable the configuration interrupt for the unsupported device, Cindy Lu, 2024/03/27
- Re: [RFC 0/2] disable the configuration interrupt for the unsupported device, Jason Wang, 2024/03/27
- Re: [RFC 0/2] disable the configuration interrupt for the unsupported device, Cindy Lu, 2024/03/27
- Re: [RFC 0/2] disable the configuration interrupt for the unsupported device, Jason Wang, 2024/03/27
- Re: [RFC 0/2] disable the configuration interrupt for the unsupported device, Jason Wang, 2024/03/27
- Re: [RFC 0/2] disable the configuration interrupt for the unsupported device, Cindy Lu, 2024/03/27
- Re: [RFC 0/2] disable the configuration interrupt for the unsupported device, Jason Wang, 2024/03/28
- Re: [RFC 0/2] disable the configuration interrupt for the unsupported device, Cindy Lu, 2024/03/28
- Re: [RFC 0/2] disable the configuration interrupt for the unsupported device, Cindy Lu, 2024/03/27
- Re: [RFC 0/2] disable the configuration interrupt for the unsupported device, Jason Wang, 2024/03/28
- Re: [RFC 0/2] disable the configuration interrupt for the unsupported device,
Cindy Lu <=
- Re: [RFC 0/2] disable the configuration interrupt for the unsupported device, Jason Wang, 2024/03/28