[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH-for-9.1] target/nios2: Remove machines and system emulation
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH-for-9.1] target/nios2: Remove machines and system emulation |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:15:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 27/3/24 14:19, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 27/03/2024 13.45, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 27/3/24 13:35, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Remove the Nios II machines and the system emulation code
(deprecated since v8.2 in commit 9997771bc1 "target/nios2:
Deprecate the Nios II architecture").
Please remind me, why didn't we deprecate the linux-user emulation, too?
Hmm I think we actually did (overall target), since there is
an issue with signals.
diff --git a/hw/nios2/Kconfig b/hw/nios2/Kconfig
deleted file mode 100644
index 4748ae27b6..0000000000
--- a/hw/nios2/Kconfig
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
-config NIOS2_10M50
- bool
- select NIOS2
- select SERIAL
- select ALTERA_TIMER
I forgot to mention I deliberately chose to keep the Altera
timer model in the tree, since it looks like a re-usable
IP component.
But if it is not used anymore by any machine, this will happily bitrot,
won't it? I think I'd rather remove it, too ... maybe in a separate
patch, so that in case somebody later needs it again, it can be restored
by simply reverting the patch again.
It is related to dynamic machines, how do we decide what components
to remove once there? I suppose we'd need to deprecate every single
component, like ALTERA_TIMER. But we are not yet generating dynamic
machines, so for now we can consider ALTERA_TIMER part of Nios II
sysemu removal. I like your idea of removing it as a separate patch.