Re: Let's close member documentation gaps

[David Hildenbrand]

On 25.03.24 15:13, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 25.03.24 10:36, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > If you're cc'ed, I have a bit of doc work for you.  Search for your
> > name to find it.
> >
> > The QAPI generator forces you to document your stuff.  Except for
> > commands, events, enum and object types listed in pragma
> > documentation-exceptions, the generator silently defaults missing
> > documentation to "Not documented".  Right now, we're using this loophole
> > some 500 times.
>
> What would be the right step to make sure I am resolving these "hidden"
> issues, and that the QAPI generator would be happy with my changes?

Ah, I assume simply removing the offender from "qapi/pragma.json" and 
then compiling.

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb