qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 12/17] esp.c: prevent cmdfifo overflow in esp_cdb_ready()


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/17] esp.c: prevent cmdfifo overflow in esp_cdb_ready()
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:26:09 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 24/3/24 20:17, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
During normal use the cmdfifo will never wrap internally and cmdfifo_cdb_offset
will always indicate the start of the SCSI CDB. However it is possible that a
malicious guest could issue an invalid ESP command sequence such that cmdfifo
wraps internally and cmdfifo_cdb_offset could point beyond the end of the FIFO
data buffer.

Add an extra check to fifo8_peek_buf() to ensure that if the cmdfifo has wrapped
internally then esp_cdb_ready() will exit rather than allow scsi_cdb_length() to
access data outside the cmdfifo data buffer.

Reported-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
---
  hw/scsi/esp.c | 12 +++++++++++-
  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/scsi/esp.c b/hw/scsi/esp.c
index f47abc36d6..d8db33b921 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/esp.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/esp.c
@@ -429,13 +429,23 @@ static bool esp_cdb_ready(ESPState *s)
  {
      int len = fifo8_num_used(&s->cmdfifo) - s->cmdfifo_cdb_offset;
      const uint8_t *pbuf;
+    uint32_t n;
      int cdblen;
if (len <= 0) {
          return false;
      }
- pbuf = fifo8_peek_buf(&s->cmdfifo, len, NULL);
+    pbuf = fifo8_peek_buf(&s->cmdfifo, len, &n);
+    if (n < len) {
+        /*
+         * In normal use the cmdfifo should never wrap, but include this check
+         * to prevent a malicious guest from reading past the end of the
+         * cmdfifo data buffer below
+         */

Can we qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR) something here?

+        return false;
+    }
+
      cdblen = scsi_cdb_length((uint8_t *)&pbuf[s->cmdfifo_cdb_offset]);
return cdblen < 0 ? false : (len >= cdblen);




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]