[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] vhost-vdpa: check vhost_vdpa_set_vring_ready() return value
From: |
Jason Wang |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] vhost-vdpa: check vhost_vdpa_set_vring_ready() return value |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Mar 2024 12:31:59 +0800 |
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 4:23 PM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:17:01AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 5:27 PM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> vhost_vdpa_set_vring_ready() could already fail, but if Linux's
> >> patch [1] will be merged, it may fail with more chance if
> >> userspace does not activate virtqueues before DRIVER_OK when
> >> VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK is not negotiated.
> >
> >I wonder what happens if we just leave it as is.
>
> Are you referring to this patch or the kernel patch?
This patch.
>
> Here I'm just checking the return value of vhost_vdpa_set_vring_ready().
> It can return an error also without that kernel patch, so IMHO is
> better to check the return value here in QEMU.
>
> What issue do you see with this patch applied?
For the parent which can enable after driver_ok but not advertise it.
(To say the truth, I'm not sure if we need to care about this)
>
> >
> >VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK: We do know enabling could be
> >done after driver_ok.
> >Without VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK: We don't know whether
> >enabling could be done after driver_ok or not.
>
> I see your point, indeed I didn't send a v2 of that patch.
> Maybe we should document that, because it could be interpreted that if
> VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK is not negotiated the enabling
> should always be done before driver_ok (which is true for example in
> VDUSE).
I see, so I think we probably need the fix.
>
> BTW I think we should discuss it in the kernel patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >>
> >> So better check its return value anyway.
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/20240206145154.118044-1-sgarzare@redhat.com/T/#u
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> Note: This patch conflicts with [2], but the resolution is simple,
> >> so for now I sent a patch for the current master, but I'll rebase
> >> this patch if we merge the other one first.
Will go through [2].
Thanks
> >>
> >> [2]
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20240202132521.32714-1-kwolf@redhat.com/
> >> ---
> >> hw/virtio/vdpa-dev.c | 8 +++++++-
> >> net/vhost-vdpa.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> >> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vdpa-dev.c b/hw/virtio/vdpa-dev.c
> >> index eb9ecea83b..d57cd76c18 100644
> >> --- a/hw/virtio/vdpa-dev.c
> >> +++ b/hw/virtio/vdpa-dev.c
> >> @@ -259,7 +259,11 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_device_start(VirtIODevice
> >> *vdev, Error **errp)
> >> goto err_guest_notifiers;
> >> }
> >> for (i = 0; i < s->dev.nvqs; ++i) {
> >> - vhost_vdpa_set_vring_ready(&s->vdpa, i);
> >> + ret = vhost_vdpa_set_vring_ready(&s->vdpa, i);
> >> + if (ret < 0) {
> >> + error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "Error starting vring %d", i);
> >> + goto err_dev_stop;
> >> + }
> >> }
> >> s->started = true;
> >>
> >> @@ -274,6 +278,8 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_device_start(VirtIODevice *vdev,
> >> Error **errp)
> >>
> >> return ret;
> >>
> >> +err_dev_stop:
> >> + vhost_dev_stop(&s->dev, vdev, false);
> >> err_guest_notifiers:
> >> k->set_guest_notifiers(qbus->parent, s->dev.nvqs, false);
> >> err_host_notifiers:
> >> diff --git a/net/vhost-vdpa.c b/net/vhost-vdpa.c
> >> index 3726ee5d67..e3d8036479 100644
> >> --- a/net/vhost-vdpa.c
> >> +++ b/net/vhost-vdpa.c
> >> @@ -381,7 +381,10 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_net_data_load(NetClientState
> >> *nc)
> >> }
> >>
> >> for (int i = 0; i < v->dev->nvqs; ++i) {
> >> - vhost_vdpa_set_vring_ready(v, i + v->dev->vq_index);
> >> + int ret = vhost_vdpa_set_vring_ready(v, i + v->dev->vq_index);
> >> + if (ret < 0) {
> >> + return ret;
> >> + }
> >> }
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >> @@ -1213,7 +1216,10 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_load(NetClientState
> >> *nc)
> >>
> >> assert(nc->info->type == NET_CLIENT_DRIVER_VHOST_VDPA);
> >>
> >> - vhost_vdpa_set_vring_ready(v, v->dev->vq_index);
> >> + r = vhost_vdpa_set_vring_ready(v, v->dev->vq_index);
> >> + if (unlikely(r < 0)) {
> >> + return r;
> >> + }
> >>
> >> if (v->shadow_vqs_enabled) {
> >> n = VIRTIO_NET(v->dev->vdev);
> >> @@ -1252,7 +1258,10 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_load(NetClientState
> >> *nc)
> >> }
> >>
> >> for (int i = 0; i < v->dev->vq_index; ++i) {
> >> - vhost_vdpa_set_vring_ready(v, i);
> >> + r = vhost_vdpa_set_vring_ready(v, i);
> >> + if (unlikely(r < 0)) {
> >> + return r;
> >> + }
> >> }
> >>
> >> return 0;
> >> --
> >> 2.43.0
> >>
> >
>
Re: [PATCH] vhost-vdpa: check vhost_vdpa_set_vring_ready() return value, Eugenio Perez Martin, 2024/03/18