[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] vhost: Perform memory section dirty scans once per it
From: |
Jason Wang |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] vhost: Perform memory section dirty scans once per iteration |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Mar 2024 12:03:49 +0800 |
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 5:39 AM Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> On setups with one or more virtio-net devices with vhost on,
> dirty tracking iteration increases cost the bigger the number
> amount of queues are set up e.g. on idle guests migration the
> following is observed with virtio-net with vhost=on:
>
> 48 queues -> 78.11% [.] vhost_dev_sync_region.isra.13
> 8 queues -> 40.50% [.] vhost_dev_sync_region.isra.13
> 1 queue -> 6.89% [.] vhost_dev_sync_region.isra.13
> 2 devices, 1 queue -> 18.60% [.] vhost_dev_sync_region.isra.14
>
> With high memory rates the symptom is lack of convergence as soon
> as it has a vhost device with a sufficiently high number of queues,
> the sufficient number of vhost devices.
>
> On every migration iteration (every 100msecs) it will redundantly
> query the *shared log* the number of queues configured with vhost
> that exist in the guest. For the virtqueue data, this is necessary,
> but not for the memory sections which are the same. So essentially
> we end up scanning the dirty log too often.
>
> To fix that, select a vhost device responsible for scanning the
> log with regards to memory sections dirty tracking. It is selected
> when we enable the logger (during migration) and cleared when we
> disable the logger. If the vhost logger device goes away for some
> reason, the logger will be re-selected from the rest of vhost
> devices.
>
> After making mem-section logger a singleton instance, constant cost
> of 7%-9% (like the 1 queue report) will be seen, no matter how many
> queues or how many vhost devices are configured:
>
> 48 queues -> 8.71% [.] vhost_dev_sync_region.isra.13
> 2 devices, 8 queues -> 7.97% [.] vhost_dev_sync_region.isra.14
>
> Co-developed-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
>
> ---
> v3 -> v4:
> - add comment to clarify effect on cache locality and
> performance
>
> v2 -> v3:
> - add after-fix benchmark to commit log
> - rename vhost_log_dev_enabled to vhost_dev_should_log
> - remove unneeded comparisons for backend_type
> - use QLIST array instead of single flat list to store vhost
> logger devices
> - simplify logger election logic
> ---
> hw/virtio/vhost.c | 67
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> include/hw/virtio/vhost.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> index 612f4db..58522f1 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
>
> static struct vhost_log *vhost_log[VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_MAX];
> static struct vhost_log *vhost_log_shm[VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_MAX];
> +static QLIST_HEAD(, vhost_dev) vhost_log_devs[VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_MAX];
>
> /* Memslots used by backends that support private memslots (without an fd).
> */
> static unsigned int used_memslots;
> @@ -149,6 +150,47 @@ bool vhost_dev_has_iommu(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> }
> }
>
> +static inline bool vhost_dev_should_log(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> +{
> + assert(dev->vhost_ops);
> + assert(dev->vhost_ops->backend_type > VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_NONE);
> + assert(dev->vhost_ops->backend_type < VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_MAX);
> +
> + return dev == QLIST_FIRST(&vhost_log_devs[dev->vhost_ops->backend_type]);
A dumb question, why not simple check
dev->log == vhost_log_shm[dev->vhost_ops->backend_type]
?
Thanks
- [PATCH v4 1/2] vhost: dirty log should be per backend type, Si-Wei Liu, 2024/03/14
- [PATCH v4 2/2] vhost: Perform memory section dirty scans once per iteration, Si-Wei Liu, 2024/03/14
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] vhost: Perform memory section dirty scans once per iteration,
Jason Wang <=
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] vhost: Perform memory section dirty scans once per iteration, Si-Wei Liu, 2024/03/15
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] vhost: Perform memory section dirty scans once per iteration, Jason Wang, 2024/03/17
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] vhost: Perform memory section dirty scans once per iteration, Si-Wei Liu, 2024/03/18
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] vhost: Perform memory section dirty scans once per iteration, Jason Wang, 2024/03/19
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] vhost: Perform memory section dirty scans once per iteration, Si-Wei Liu, 2024/03/20
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] vhost: Perform memory section dirty scans once per iteration, Jason Wang, 2024/03/20
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] vhost: Perform memory section dirty scans once per iteration, Si-Wei Liu, 2024/03/21
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] vhost: Perform memory section dirty scans once per iteration, Jason Wang, 2024/03/22
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] vhost: Perform memory section dirty scans once per iteration, Si-Wei Liu, 2024/03/22
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] vhost: Perform memory section dirty scans once per iteration, Jason Wang, 2024/03/25