[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] intel_iommu: Add a framework to check and sync host I
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] intel_iommu: Add a framework to check and sync host IOMMU cap/ecap |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Mar 2024 13:03:38 -0400 |
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 05:44:29PM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
>
> Add a framework to check and synchronize host IOMMU cap/ecap with
> vIOMMU cap/ecap.
>
> The sequence will be:
>
> vtd_cap_init() initializes iommu->cap/ecap.
> vtd_check_hdev() update iommu->cap/ecap based on host cap/ecap.
> iommu->cap_frozen set when machine create done, iommu->cap/ecap become
> readonly.
>
> Implementation details for different backends will be in following patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
> ---
> include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h | 1 +
> hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h b/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
> index bbc7b96add..c71a133820 100644
> --- a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
> +++ b/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
> @@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ struct IntelIOMMUState {
>
> uint64_t cap; /* The value of capability reg */
> uint64_t ecap; /* The value of extended capability reg
> */
> + bool cap_frozen; /* cap/ecap become read-only after
> frozen */
>
> uint32_t context_cache_gen; /* Should be in [1,MAX] */
> GHashTable *iotlb; /* IOTLB */
> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> index ffa1ad6429..a9f9dfd6a7 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
> #include "sysemu/kvm.h"
> #include "sysemu/dma.h"
> #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
> +#include "hw/vfio/vfio-common.h"
> +#include "sysemu/iommufd.h"
> #include "hw/i386/apic_internal.h"
> #include "kvm/kvm_i386.h"
> #include "migration/vmstate.h"
> @@ -3819,6 +3821,38 @@ VTDAddressSpace *vtd_find_add_as(IntelIOMMUState *s,
> PCIBus *bus,
> return vtd_dev_as;
> }
>
> +static int vtd_check_legacy_hdev(IntelIOMMUState *s,
> + IOMMULegacyDevice *ldev,
> + Error **errp)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vtd_check_iommufd_hdev(IntelIOMMUState *s,
> + IOMMUFDDevice *idev,
> + Error **errp)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vtd_check_hdev(IntelIOMMUState *s, VTDHostIOMMUDevice *vtd_hdev,
> + Error **errp)
> +{
> + HostIOMMUDevice *base_dev = vtd_hdev->dev;
> + IOMMUFDDevice *idev;
> +
> + if (base_dev->type == HID_LEGACY) {
> + IOMMULegacyDevice *ldev = container_of(base_dev,
> + IOMMULegacyDevice, base);
> +
> + return vtd_check_legacy_hdev(s, ldev, errp);
> + }
> +
> + idev = container_of(base_dev, IOMMUFDDevice, base);
> +
> + return vtd_check_iommufd_hdev(s, idev, errp);
> +}
> +
> static int vtd_dev_set_iommu_device(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque, int devfn,
> HostIOMMUDevice *base_dev, Error **errp)
> {
> @@ -3829,6 +3863,7 @@ static int vtd_dev_set_iommu_device(PCIBus *bus, void
> *opaque, int devfn,
> .devfn = devfn,
> };
> struct vtd_as_key *new_key;
> + int ret;
>
> assert(base_dev);
>
> @@ -3848,6 +3883,13 @@ static int vtd_dev_set_iommu_device(PCIBus *bus, void
> *opaque, int devfn,
> vtd_hdev->iommu_state = s;
> vtd_hdev->dev = base_dev;
>
> + ret = vtd_check_hdev(s, vtd_hdev, errp);
> + if (ret) {
> + g_free(vtd_hdev);
> + vtd_iommu_unlock(s);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> new_key = g_malloc(sizeof(*new_key));
> new_key->bus = bus;
> new_key->devfn = devfn;
Okay. So when VFIO device is created, it will call vtd_dev_set_iommu_device
and that in turn will update caps.
> @@ -4083,7 +4125,9 @@ static void vtd_init(IntelIOMMUState *s)
> s->iq_dw = false;
> s->next_frcd_reg = 0;
>
> - vtd_cap_init(s);
> + if (!s->cap_frozen) {
> + vtd_cap_init(s);
> + }
>
If it's fronzen it's because VFIO was added after machine done.
And then what? I think caps are just wrong?
I think the way to approach this is just by specifying this
as an option on command line.
So if one wants VFIO one has to sync caps with host.
No?
> /*
> * Rsvd field masks for spte
> @@ -4254,6 +4298,10 @@ static int vtd_machine_done_notify_one(Object *child,
> void *unused)
>
> static void vtd_machine_done_hook(Notifier *notifier, void *unused)
> {
> + IntelIOMMUState *iommu = INTEL_IOMMU_DEVICE(x86_iommu_get_default());
> +
> + iommu->cap_frozen = true;
> +
> object_child_foreach_recursive(object_get_root(),
> vtd_machine_done_notify_one, NULL);
> }
> --
> 2.34.1
- Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] intel_iommu: Add a framework to check and sync host IOMMU cap/ecap,
Michael S. Tsirkin <=
- RE: [PATCH v1 3/6] intel_iommu: Add a framework to check and sync host IOMMU cap/ecap, Duan, Zhenzhong, 2024/03/12
- Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] intel_iommu: Add a framework to check and sync host IOMMU cap/ecap, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2024/03/13
- RE: [PATCH v1 3/6] intel_iommu: Add a framework to check and sync host IOMMU cap/ecap, Duan, Zhenzhong, 2024/03/13
- Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] intel_iommu: Add a framework to check and sync host IOMMU cap/ecap, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2024/03/13
- RE: [PATCH v1 3/6] intel_iommu: Add a framework to check and sync host IOMMU cap/ecap, Duan, Zhenzhong, 2024/03/14
- Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] intel_iommu: Add a framework to check and sync host IOMMU cap/ecap, Eric Auger, 2024/03/18
- Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] intel_iommu: Add a framework to check and sync host IOMMU cap/ecap, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2024/03/28
- RE: [PATCH v1 3/6] intel_iommu: Add a framework to check and sync host IOMMU cap/ecap, Duan, Zhenzhong, 2024/03/28