[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] migration/multifd: Implement zero page transmission
From: |
hao . xiang |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] migration/multifd: Implement zero page transmission on the multifd thread. |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Mar 2024 08:08:14 +0000 |
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 10:24 AM Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> writes:
>
>
>
> Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 02:28:24AM +0000, Hao Xiang wrote:
>
>
>
> -GlobalProperty hw_compat_8_2[] = {};
>
>
>
> +GlobalProperty hw_compat_8_2[] = {
>
>
>
> + { "migration", "zero-page-detection", "legacy"},
>
>
>
> +};
>
>
>
> I hope we can make it for 9.0, then this (and many rest places) can be kept
>
>
>
> as-is. Let's see.. soft-freeze is March 12th.
>
>
>
> One thing to mention is I just sent a pull which has mapped-ram feature
>
>
>
> merged. You may need a rebase onto that, and hopefully mapped-ram can also
>
>
>
> use your feature too within the same patch when you repost.
>
>
>
> The key points are:
>
>
>
> - The socket migration is under "use_packets", the mapped-ram is under
>
>
>
> "!use_packets" always.
>
>
>
> - mapped-ram doesn't trasmit zero-pages, it just clears the
>
>
>
> corresponding bit in block->file_bmap.
>
>
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240229153017.2221-1-farosas@suse.de/
>
>
>
> That rebase may or may not need much caution, I apologize for that:
>
>
>
> mapped-ram as a feature was discussed 1+ years, so it was a plan to merge
>
>
>
> it (actually still partly of it) into QEMU 9.0.
>
>
>
> I started doing that rebase last week and saw issues with a sender
>
>
>
> thread always getting -EPIPE at the sendmsg() on the regular socket
>
>
>
> migration. Let's hope it was just me being tired.
>
>
>
> I'll try to get something ready this week.
>
>
>
> @Hao Xiang:
>
>
>
> Here's a branch with the rebase. Please include the first two commits
>
>
>
> when you repost:
>
>
>
> migration/multifd: Allow clearing of the file_bmap from multifd
>
>
>
> migration/multifd: Allow zero pages in file migration
>
>
>
> There are also two small additions and some conflict resolution at the
>
>
>
> "Implement zero page..." commit. Make sure you don't miss them.
>
>
>
> https://gitlab.com/farosas/qemu/-/commits/migration-multifd-zero-page
>
>
>
> Let me know if you encounter any issues.
>
Sorry about the delay. I have rebased and pulled in the two commits you
mentioned. Test works fine. I just sent out a new version.
I removed the zero/zero-bytes interface changes out of this patchset but will
follow up with a separate one.
Message not available