[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: possible deprecation and removal of some old QEMU Arm machine types
From: |
Guenter Roeck |
Subject: |
Re: possible deprecation and removal of some old QEMU Arm machine types (pxa2xx, omap, sa1110) |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Mar 2024 07:50:23 -0800 |
On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 03:41:48PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 15:36, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 03:14:21PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 14:36, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> > > > On 2/12/24 04:32, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > > > The machines I have in mind are:
> > > > >
> > > > > PXA2xx machines:
> > > > >
> > > > > akita Sharp SL-C1000 (Akita) PDA (PXA270)
> > > > > borzoi Sharp SL-C3100 (Borzoi) PDA (PXA270)
> > > > > connex Gumstix Connex (PXA255)
> > > > > mainstone Mainstone II (PXA27x)
> > > > > spitz Sharp SL-C3000 (Spitz) PDA (PXA270)
> > > > > terrier Sharp SL-C3200 (Terrier) PDA (PXA270)
> > > > > tosa Sharp SL-6000 (Tosa) PDA (PXA255)
> > > > > verdex Gumstix Verdex Pro XL6P COMs (PXA270)
> > > > > z2 Zipit Z2 (PXA27x)
>
> > > > > OMAP1 machines:
> > > > >
> > > > > cheetah Palm Tungsten|E aka. Cheetah PDA (OMAP310)
> > > > > sx1 Siemens SX1 (OMAP310) V2
> > > > > sx1-v1 Siemens SX1 (OMAP310) V1
>
> > > > > OMAP2 machines:
> > > > >
> > > > > n800 Nokia N800 tablet aka. RX-34 (OMAP2420)
> > > > > n810 Nokia N810 tablet aka. RX-44 (OMAP2420)
>
> > > > > The one SA1110 machine:
> > > > >
> > > > > collie Sharp SL-5500 (Collie) PDA (SA-1110)
>
> > I am copying Arnd, the OMAP1 Linux kernel maintainers, PXA2 maintainers,
> > and the Linux omap mailing list for input. Sorry for the noise for those
> > who don't care, but I think it is useful to have your voices heard.
>
> Thanks to everybody for your input on this thread. My
> proposal is to drop from QEMU:
> * all the PXA2xx machines
> * all the OMAP2 machines
> * the cheetah OMAP1 machine
>
> leaving (at least for now) sx1, sx1-v1, collie.
>
> Rationale:
> * for QEMU dropping individual machines is much less beneficial
> than if we can drop support for an entire SoC
> * the OMAP2 QEMU code in particular is large, old and unmaintained,
> and none of the OMAP2 kernel maintainers said they were using
> QEMU in any of their testing/development
> * although Guenter is currently booting test kernels on some
> of the PXA2xx machines, nobody seemed to be using them as part
> of their active kernel development and my impression from the
> thread is that PXA is the closest of all these SoC families to
> being dropped from the kernel soon
> * nobody said they were using cheetah, so it's entirely
> untested and quite probably broken
> * on the other hand the OMAP1 sx1 model does seem to be being
> used as part of kernel development, and there was interest
> in keeping collie around
>
> I'm going to mark these as deprecated for the QEMU 9.0 release,
> which by our deprecate-and-drop policy means they will be
> still present in 9.0 (due out in April) and 9.1 (August-ish),
> and removed in 9.2 (December).
>
> I'm potentially open to persuasion if anybody thinks I'm
> being too drastic here; persuasion that came attached to
> a desire to help modernise the QEMU code for the relevant
> machines would be the most effective :-)
>
sgtm
Guenter