qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PULL 04/29] {linux,bsd}-user: Update ts_tid after fork()


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: [PULL 04/29] {linux,bsd}-user: Update ts_tid after fork()
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 14:40:16 +0000

From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>

Currently ts_tid contains the parent tid after fork(), which is not
correct. So far it has not affected anything, but the upcoming
follow-fork-mode child support relies on the correct value, so fix it.

Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Message-Id: <20240219141628.246823-4-iii@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20240305121005.3528075-5-alex.bennee@linaro.org>

diff --git a/bsd-user/main.c b/bsd-user/main.c
index 512d4ab69fc..e39eef3040f 100644
--- a/bsd-user/main.c
+++ b/bsd-user/main.c
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ void fork_end(int child)
          * state, so we don't need to end_exclusive() here.
          */
         qemu_init_cpu_list();
+        get_task_state(thread_cpu)->ts_tid = qemu_get_thread_id();
         gdbserver_fork(thread_cpu);
     } else {
         mmap_fork_end(child);
diff --git a/linux-user/main.c b/linux-user/main.c
index 551acf16619..699da773714 100644
--- a/linux-user/main.c
+++ b/linux-user/main.c
@@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ void fork_end(int child)
             }
         }
         qemu_init_cpu_list();
+        get_task_state(thread_cpu)->ts_tid = qemu_get_thread_id();
         gdbserver_fork(thread_cpu);
     } else {
         cpu_list_unlock();
-- 
2.39.2




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]