Re: [PATCH v6 00/23] migration: File based migration with multifd and mapped-ram

[Peter Xu]

On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 10:09:25AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> Perhaps if we move the fsync to the same spot as the multifd thread sync
> instead of having a big one at the end? Not sure how that looks with
> concurrency in the mix.

Can try, but I think the bottleneck should normally be on the block
backend, in which case I won't be surprised concurrency on flushing won't
help then.

Please see my other proposal on removing fdatasync() from qemu; I could
overlook some reason to have it, though..

-- 
Peter Xu