[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] migration/multifd: Document two places for mapped-ram
From: |
Prasad Pandit |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] migration/multifd: Document two places for mapped-ram |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Mar 2024 10:51:30 +0530 |
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 06:00, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
> Yes I think you're looking at the right path, it's just that the relevant
> patches haven't yet landed upstream but is planned. I normally use
> "Based-on" tag for such patch that has a dependency outside master, like:
>
> Based-on: <20240229153017.2221-1-farosas@suse.de>
>
> I believe many others on the qemu list do the same. I think the rational
> is this will be both recognized by human beings and also by patchew,
> e.g. patchew will report a good apply status here:
>
> 20240301091524.39900-1-peterx@redhat.com/">https://patchew.org/QEMU/20240301091524.39900-1-peterx@redhat.com/
>
> And in the same patch if you fetch the tree patchew provided:
>
> git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu
> tags/patchew/20240301091524.39900-1-peterx@redhat.com
>
> You can also directly fetch the whole tree with this patch applied
> correctly on top of the dependency series.
>
> Personally I don't use patchew, but I kept that habit to declare patch
> dependencies just in case it'll help others who use it (e.g., I think
> patchew has other review tools like version comparisons, which I also don't
> use myself).
* Interesting. Thank you.
---
- Prasad