qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC 0/4] mirror: implement incremental and bitmap modes


From: Fiona Ebner
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] mirror: implement incremental and bitmap modes
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 16:14:33 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

Am 01.03.24 um 16:02 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
> On 01.03.24 17:52, Fiona Ebner wrote:
>> Am 01.03.24 um 15:14 schrieb Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy:
>>>
>>> As we already understood, (block-)job-api needs some spring-cleaning.
>>> Unfortunately I don't have much time on it, but still I decided to start
>>> from finally depreacting block-job-* API and moving to job-*.. Probably
>>> bitmap/bitmap-mode/sync APIs also need some optimization, keeping in
>>> mind new block-dirty-bitmap-merge api.
>>>
>>> So, what I could advice in this situation for newc interfaces:
>>>
>>> 1. be minimalistic
>>> 2. add `x-` prefix when unsure
>>>
>>> So, following these two rules, what about x-bitmap field, which may be
>>> combined only with 'full' mode, and do what you need?
>>>
>>
>> AFAIU, it should rather be marked as @unstable in QAPI [0]? Then it
>> doesn't need to be renamed if it becomes stable later.
> 
> Right, unstable feature is needed, using "x-" is optional.
> 
> Recent discussion about it was in my "vhost-user-blk: live resize
> additional APIs" series:
> 
> https://patchew.org/QEMU/20231006202045.1161543-1-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru/20231006202045.1161543-5-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru/
> 
> Following it, I think it's OK to not care anymore with "x-" prefixes,
> and rely on unstable feature.
> 

Thanks for the confirmation! I'll go without the prefix in the name then.

>>
>>> About documentation: actually, I never liked that we use for backup job
>>> "MirrorSyncMode". Now it looks more like "BackupSyncMode", having two
>>> values supported only by backup.
>>>
>>> I'm also unsure how mode=full&bitmap=some_bitmap differs from
>>> mode=bitmap&bitmap=some_bitmap..
>>>
>>
>> With the current patches, it was an error to specify @bitmap for other
>> modes than 'incremental' and 'bitmap'.
> 
> Current documentation says:
>   # @bitmap: The name of a dirty bitmap to use.  Must be present if sync
>   #     is "bitmap" or "incremental". Can be present if sync is "full"
>   #     or "top".  Must not be present otherwise.
>   #     (Since 2.4 (drive-backup), 3.1 (blockdev-backup))
> 
> 

This is for backup. The documentation (and behavior) for @bitmap added
by these patches for mirror is different ;)

Best Regards,
Fiona




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]