[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v6 00/41] Raspberry Pi 4B machine
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v6 00/41] Raspberry Pi 4B machine |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Feb 2024 11:26:55 +0000 |
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 18:09, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> I think the one question I have left is the name of the
> board: currently it's "raspi4b-2g", but should we name
> it just "raspi4b"? None of the names we use for the other
> raspi boards we model have a suffix like the "-2g" here.
> Philippe, do you have an opinion here ?
I had a look at what the different raspi4 models are, and
it looks like they're all the same except for the amount
of RAM. For QEMU, if we wanted to allow users to pick
the RAM size we'd do it via the -m option, not by using
different model names. So I think on that basis and to
match the existing raspi machine names, we should call
this simply "raspi4b". So I'll make that name change in the
patches I have in target-arm.next.
thanks
-- PMM
- Re: [PATCH v6 30/41] Add Rpi4b boot tests, (continued)
- [PATCH v6 36/41] Add mailbox property tests. Part 1, Sergey Kambalin, 2024/02/25
- [PATCH v6 40/41] Append added properties to mailbox test, Sergey Kambalin, 2024/02/25
- [PATCH v6 39/41] Add missed BCM2835 properties, Sergey Kambalin, 2024/02/25
- [PATCH v6 38/41] Add mailbox property tests. Part 3, Sergey Kambalin, 2024/02/25
- Re: [PATCH v6 00/41] Raspberry Pi 4B machine, Peter Maydell, 2024/02/26
- Re: [PATCH v6 00/41] Raspberry Pi 4B machine,
Peter Maydell <=
- Re: [PATCH v6 00/41] Raspberry Pi 4B machine, Peter Maydell, 2024/02/27