[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v5 10/10] tests/bench: Add bufferiszero-bench
From: |
Daniel P . Berrangé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v5 10/10] tests/bench: Add bufferiszero-bench |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Feb 2024 10:02:32 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.12 (2023-09-09) |
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 09:21:50AM -1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 2/16/24 23:49, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 16 Feb 2024, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >
> > > Benchmark each acceleration function vs an aligned buffer of zeros.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > +
> > > +static void test(const void *opaque)
> > > +{
> > > + size_t len = 64 * KiB;
> >
> > This exceeds L1 cache capacity, so the performance ceiling of L2 cache
> > throughput is easier to hit with a suboptimal implementation. It also
> > seems to vastly exceed typical buffer sizes in Qemu.
> >
> > When preparing the patch we mostly tested at 8 KiB. The size decides
> > whether the branch exiting the loop becomes perfectly predictable in
> > the microbenchmark, e.g. at 128 bytes per iteration it exits on the
> > 63'rd iteration, which Intel predictors cannot track, so we get
> > one mispredict per call.
> >
> > (so perhaps smaller sizes like 2 or 4 KiB are better)
>
> Fair. I've adjusted to loop over 1, 4, 16, 64 KiB.
>
> # Start of bufferiszero tests
> # buffer_is_zero #0: 1KB 49227.29 MB/sec
> # buffer_is_zero #0: 4KB 137461.28 MB/sec
> # buffer_is_zero #0: 16KB 224220.41 MB/sec
> # buffer_is_zero #0: 64KB 142461.00 MB/sec
> # buffer_is_zero #1: 1KB 45423.59 MB/sec
> # buffer_is_zero #1: 4KB 91409.69 MB/sec
> # buffer_is_zero #1: 16KB 123819.94 MB/sec
> # buffer_is_zero #1: 64KB 71173.75 MB/sec
> # buffer_is_zero #2: 1KB 35465.03 MB/sec
> # buffer_is_zero #2: 4KB 56110.46 MB/sec
> # buffer_is_zero #2: 16KB 68852.28 MB/sec
> # buffer_is_zero #2: 64KB 39043.80 MB/sec
Totally nit-picking, but it would be easier to read with a little
alignment and blanks lines:
# buffer_is_zero #0: 1KB 49227.29 MB/sec
# buffer_is_zero #0: 4KB 137461.28 MB/sec
# buffer_is_zero #0: 16KB 224220.41 MB/sec
# buffer_is_zero #0: 64KB 142461.00 MB/sec
# buffer_is_zero #1: 1KB 45423.59 MB/sec
# buffer_is_zero #1: 4KB 91409.69 MB/sec
# buffer_is_zero #1: 16KB 123819.94 MB/sec
# buffer_is_zero #1: 64KB 71173.75 MB/sec
# buffer_is_zero #2: 1KB 35465.03 MB/sec
# buffer_is_zero #2: 4KB 56110.46 MB/sec
# buffer_is_zero #2: 16KB 68852.28 MB/sec
# buffer_is_zero #2: 64KB 39043.80 MB/sec
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
- Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] util/bufferiszero: Improve scalar variant, (continued)